ArticleScientific reports2022
Interim FDG-PET/CT for therapy monitoring and prognostication in Hodgkin's Lymphoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- The prognostic utility ofFrontiers in immunology · 2024Pooled it
- Baseline plasma-informed circulating tumor DNA analyses comparing multiplex digital PCR and NGS for longitudinal monitoring in Hodgkin lymphoma.Blood cancer journal · 2026Article
- Prognostic utility of interimAsia Oceania journal of nuclear medicine & biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Differentiating Hodgkin Lymphoma and Sarcoid Reaction in Subsequent FDG-PET/CT: A Case Report and Literature Review.World journal of nuclear medicine · 2023Article
- FDG-PET/CT in the Monitoring of Lymphoma Immunotherapy Response: Current Status and Future Prospects.Cancers · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to assess the predictive value of interim FDG-PET/CT (iPET) in patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) treated with Adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (ABVD) chemotherapy. A total of 245 consecutive patients with de novo HL between 12/2013 and 12/2017 were evaluated retrospectively. All patients were treated with upfront ABVD, performed PET/CT scans at baseline, after 2 cycles (interim PET, iPET2) or 4 cycles (iPET4) and at the end of therapy, and followed up for at least 6 months after therapy. The response status on iPET was defined according to the standard five-point Deauville scores (DS) as follows: complete metabolic response (CMR, DS 1-3) and non-complete metabolic response (nCMR) (DS 4 and 5). End-of-treatment (EoT) response was assessed by FDG-PET/CT and if needed biopsy confirmation of PET-positive findings. The association between iPET and EoT response was investigated using logistic regression analysis. Survival analysis was performed using the Cox regression hazard model and Kaplan-Meier methods. Sixty-nine patients underwent iPET-2 and 176 iPET-4. No association was found between the timing of iPET and iPET response status (P-value = 0.71). Two hundred and one patients (82%) had iPET-CMR and 44 (18%) iPET -nCMR. iPET was strongly associated with EoT response status: 194/201 (96 .5%) of iPET-CMR had a complete response at the EoT while only 21/44 (47.7%) of patients with iPET-nCMR presented a complete response at EoT (P-value < 0.0001). The median follow-up was 32 months (range 6-81). Patients with iPET-CMR presented a better outcome with 91% 3 y event-free-survival (EFS) and 95% 3 y overall survival (OS) than those with iPET-nCMR (41 and 86%, respectively, P-value < 0.0001). In multivariable analyses, iPET retained an independent prognostic factor of EFS and OS (P-value < 0.0001 and P-value = 0.002, respectively). iPET is highly predictive of outcome of HL patients treated with ABVD and allows to tailor therapy to the individual patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.