Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36271104›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Contrast volume and in-hospital outcomes of dialysis patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Toshiki Kuno, Yohei Numasawa, Satoshi Shoji, Ikuko Ueda, Masahiro Suzuki, Shigetaka Noma, Keiichi Fukuda, Shun Kohsaka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Toshiki KunoDivision of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 East 210Th St, New York, NY, 10467-2401, USA. tkuno@montefiore.org.
Yohei NumasawaDepartment of Cardiology, Japanese Red Cross Ashikaga Hospital, Ashikaga, Japan.
Satoshi ShojiDepartment of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Ikuko UedaDepartment of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Masahiro SuzukiDepartment of Cardiology, Saitama National Hospital, Wako, Japan.
Shigetaka NomaDepartment of Cardiology, Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital, Utsunomiya, Japan.
Keiichi FukudaDepartment of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shun KohsakaDepartment of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Keio University · JPAshikaga Red Cross Hospital · JPMontefiore Medical Center · USSaiseikai Utsunomiya hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toxicity resulting from retained contrast media may cause adverse cardiovascular outcomes (e.g., heart failure and cardiogenic shock) for dialysis patients. However, the association between the administered contrast volume and outcomes of dialysis patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been sufficiently investigated. We evaluated 953 consecutive dialysis patients (age, 67.9 ± 9.9 years; 30.1% with acute coronary syndrome) who underwent PCI between September 2008 and March 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: those with a contrast volume ≥ 200 ml and those with a contrast volume < 200 ml. The cutoff was 200 ml because 100 ml increment of contrast volume is known to raise the risk of acute kidney injury, and 200 ml is more than the average volume used at most PCI centers. The primary endpoint was a composite of in-hospital death, post-PCI cardiogenic shock and post-PCI heart failure. A multivariable logistic regression model and smooth spline curve were constructed to assess the association between contrast volume and the primary endpoint. The median contrast volume was 157 ml (interquartile range, 115-210 ml). The overall primary endpoint incidence was 6.8% (N = 65). A contrast volume ≥ 200 ml was associated with a higher risk of the primary endpoint (odds ratio 2.91; 95% confidence interval 1.42-6.05; P = 0.004). The smooth spline curve demonstrated a linear relationship between the contrast volume and primary endpoint. In conclusions, the contrast volume was associated with adverse in-hospital outcomes of dialysis patients undergoing PCI. Attention should be focused on the contrast volume used for dialysis patients undergoing PCI.

Indexed as

Heart FailurePercutaneous Coronary InterventionAgedContrast MediaHospital MortalityHospitalsHumansMiddle AgedRenal DialysisRisk FactorsShock, CardiogenicTreatment OutcomeContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID36271104
PMCPMC9587255
OpenAlexW4307028186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.