Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36270763›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2022

Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in perioperative care: a systematic review of a complex intervention.

Rachael Lucia Miller, Jonathan David Barnes, Ronelle Mouton, Philip Braude, Robert Hinchliffe

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Geriatric Models of Surgical Care: A Scoping Review.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Survival outcomes in patients with sigmoid volvulus.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Elderly Rectal Cancer: An Updated Review.Current oncology reports · 2024
    Review
  14. Diagnosis of frailty and implications on surgical process in the elderly: A narrative review.European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rachael Lucia MillerTranslational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK rm17210@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7918-4196
Jonathan David BarnesAnaesthesia, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Ronelle MoutonTranslational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Philip BraudeCLARITY (Collaborate Ageing Research) group, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Robert HinchliffeTranslational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
North Bristol NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesComprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is a complex intervention applied to older people with evidence of benefit in medical populations. The aim of this systematic review was to describe how CGA is applied to surgical populations in randomised controlled trials. This will provide a basis for design of future studies focused on optimising CGA as a complex intervention.

settingA systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

participantsA systematic search was performed for studies of CGA in the perioperative period across Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane CENTRAL, from inception to March 2021.

interventionsAny randomised controlled trials of perioperative CGA versus 'standard care' were included. OUTCOME MEASURES: Qualitative description of CGA.

results12 121 titles and abstracts were screened, 68 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility and 22 articles included, reporting on 13 trials. 10 trials focused on inpatients with hip fracture, with 7 of these delivering CGA on a geriatric medicine ward, 3 on a surgical ward. The remaining three trials were in elective general surgery all delivering CGA on a surgical ward. CGA components, duration of intervention and personnel delivering the intervention were highly variable across the different studies. Trials favoured postoperative delivery of CGA (11/13). Only four trials reported data on adherence to the CGA intervention.

conclusionsCGA as an intervention is variably described and delivered in randomised controlled trials in the perioperative setting. The reporting of both the intervention and standard care is often poor with little focus on adherence. Future research should focus on clearly defining and standardising the intervention as well as measuring adherence within trials. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020221797.

Indexed as

GeriatricsHip FracturesAgedElective Surgical ProceduresGeriatric AssessmentHumansPerioperative CareGERIATRIC MEDICINEQUALITATIVE RESEARCHSURGERY

Identifiers

PMID36270763
PMCPMC9594523
OpenAlexW4306993611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.