Observational studyBMJ open2022
What is the impact of introducing a non-clinical community health advice and navigation service on the demand for primary care in socially deprived areas? Evidence from an observational panel study with difference-in-differences design.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Arts on prescription intervention for primary healthcare patients with poor mental health or social isolation: a mixed-method study.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Social disparities in access and quality of consultation in outpatient care in Germany.BMC primary care · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo examine the effect of introducing a non-clinical community health advice and navigation service on the demand for primary care in a socially deprived area.
designObservational panel study with difference-in-differences design. We conducted fixed-effects negative binomial regressions to compare changes in the number of visits to general practitioners (GPs) in individuals who visited the health advice and navigation service and a matched control group of individuals who did not visit the service. In addition, we analysed the effects of visiting the service multiple times. SETTING AND
participantsOur empirical setting is a socially deprived urban area in Germany with a multicultural population of about 110 000 people. Our analyses are based on patient data (N=1044) from a non-clinical community health advice and navigation service and from two statutory health insurers. OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient demand for primary care measured as the number of visits to GPs before and after the first visit to the health advice and navigation service.
resultsVisiting the service for the first time significantly decreased the number of GP visits compared with the control group (β=-0.113, p<0.1). Each additional visit to the service, however, significantly decreased the effect of the first visit (β=0.037, p<0.05).
conclusionsOur findings suggest that non-clinical community health advice and navigation services can serve as a low-threshold first point of contact. As first point contact, such services might possibly reduce the burden of primary care physicians in socially deprived areas. At the same time, such services might function as a gateway to accessing the health system, reducing unmet care needs and stimulate demand. Ongoing counselling in the service can identify medical needs that require a physician visit. Our findings may be useful for policymakers and healthcare leaders seeking to reduce the demand on the primary care workforce and can stimulate further research in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.