Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36270660›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2022

Turning the tide on female genital mutilation in a high prevalence country: a programmatic data analysis for Sudan's comprehensive health sector response, 2016-2018.

Wisal Ahmed, Nancy Puttkammer, Stephen Gloyd, Amira Adam, Dalya Eltayeb, Carey Farquhar

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Wisal AhmedSexual Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland wahmed@who.int.ORCID 0000-0001-8155-8249
Nancy PuttkammerDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Stephen GloydDepartments of Global Health and Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Amira AdamWorld Health Organization, Sudan Country Office, Khartoum, Sudan.
Dalya EltayebPrimary Health Care Directorate, Federal Ministry of Health, Khartoum, Sudan.
Carey FarquharDepartments of Global Health, Epidemiology and Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
University of Washington · USFederal Ministry of Health · SDWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sudan has about 87% of females aged 15-49 years living with female genital mutilation (FGM), mostly performed by midwives (64%). In 2016, the Federal Ministry of Health (FMoH) adopted the WHO's global strategy to stop healthcare providers from performing FGM. Our review of activity reports from 2016 to 2018 found the format of activities (N=95) was mainly meetings (58%) and trainings (31%) with median costs of US$10 645 and US$14 964, respectively. The FMoH (57%) and student/professional associations (25%) implemented activities at national (36%) and state (62%) level. The costs of activities were highest for FMoH compared with student/professional associations and academia, respectively.Sudan addressed WHO's global strategy pillars through FGM-related policies and plans (pillar 1), trainings (pillar 2) and monitoring, evaluation and accountability materials (pillar 3) targeting mainly community midwives (N=16 183) as well as creating supportive legislative and regulatory environment (pillar 4). Governmental funding on training was comparable to donor's resulting into 31% of community midwives trained on FGM complications management. Further, 31% of community midwives signed declarations or petitions to end FGM practice, while 19% were sensitised on punitive administrative measures for conducting FGM.Although Sudan implemented a laudable health sector response to address FGM, there is a need to evaluate the quality and effectiveness of past and ongoing interventions. Particular attention to costs and quality assurance data is essential to identify cost efficient implementation approaches to reach the remaining sizeable number of health professionals to stop their involvement in FGM.

Indexed as

Circumcision, FemaleData AnalysisFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansPrevalenceSudanDescriptive studyHealth education and promotionHealth systems evaluationPrevention strategiesReview

Identifiers

PMID36270660
PMCPMC9594515
OpenAlexW4307049920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.