Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36270434›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine2022

Factors associated with timely colposcopy following an abnormal cervical cancer test result.

Sarah Feldman, Jacquelyn M Lykken, Jennifer S Haas, Claudia L Werner, Sarah C Kobrin, Jasmin A Tiro, Jessica Chubak, Aruna Kamineni

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Process Mapping to Compare and Improve Management of Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Results in Two US Healthcare Systems within the PROSPR Consortium.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Assessing Management of Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Results and Concordance with Guideline Recommendations in Three US Healthcare Settings.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Disparities in Gynecologic Cancers.Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.)
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah FeldmanDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America. Electronic address: sfeldman@bwh.harvard.edu.
Jacquelyn M LykkenDepartment of Population & Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Jennifer S HaasDivision of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Claudia L WernerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America; Parkland Health, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Sarah C KobrinDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.
Jasmin A TiroDepartment of Population & Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America; Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Jessica ChubakKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Aruna KamineniKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · USHarvard University · USNational Cancer Institute · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

PROSPR METRICS CISNET Collaboration Investigating Impact of Structural Racism/Discrimination on Cervical Screening Moonshot SupplementUM1CA221940 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHUBAK, JESSICA, HAAS, JENNIFER S · 2018 to 2023
$15.9M
NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA221940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Successful cervical cancer prevention requires screening and appropriate management of abnormal test results. Management includes diagnostic evaluation and treatment, if indicated, based on cervical cancer risk after most abnormal test results. There is little guidance on the optimal timing of diagnostic evaluation, and few data exist on factors associated with timely management. We quantified time-to-colposcopy within 12 months of an abnormal cervical cancer screening or surveillance test result from 2010 to 2018 across three diverse healthcare systems and described factors associated with timely colposcopy. Among 21-65 year-old patients with an abnormal test result for which colposcopy was indicated (n = 28,706), we calculated the proportion who received a colposcopy within 12 months of the abnormal test and used Kaplan-Meier methods to estimate the probability of colposcopy within 12 months. Across all systems, 75.3% of patients received a colposcopy within 12 months, with site-specific estimates ranging from 70.0 to 83.0%. We fit mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression models to identify factors associated with receipt of colposcopy within 12 months. The healthcare system and cytology result severity were the most important factors associated with of timely colposcopy. We observed that sites with more centralized processes had higher proportions of colposcopy completion, and patients with high-grade results were more consistently evaluated earlier than patients with low-grade results. Patient age also affected receipt of timely colposcopy, though this association differed by healthcare system and result severity. These data suggest opportunities for system-level interventions to improve management of abnormal cervical cancer test results.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedColposcopyEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPapanicolaou TestPregnancyVaginal SmearsYoung AdultAbnormal pap managementCervical cancer screeningColposcopyGuideline implementationTimely follow-up

Identifiers

PMID36270434
PMCPMC9808794
OpenAlexW4306742489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.