Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36270199›Full record

ArticleNeural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society2022

Perturbation of deep autoencoder weights for model compression and classification of tabular data.

Sakib Abrar, Manar D Samad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sakib AbrarDepartment of Computer Science, Tennessee State University, Nashville, TN 37209, United States.
Manar D SamadDepartment of Computer Science, Tennessee State University, Nashville, TN 37209, United States. Electronic address: msamad@tnstate.edu.

Funding

Optimizing the Utility of Large Electronic Health Records Data in Data-Driven Health ResearchR15LM013569 · NLM · TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SAMAD, MANAR · 2020 to 2020
$422k
NLM NIH HHS R15 LM013569
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fully connected deep neural networks (DNN) often include redundant weights leading to overfitting and high memory requirements. Additionally, in tabular data classification, DNNs are challenged by the often superior performance of traditional machine learning models. This paper proposes periodic perturbations (prune and regrow) of DNN weights, especially at the self-supervised pre-training stage of deep autoencoders. The proposed weight perturbation strategy outperforms dropout learning or weight regularization (L1 or L2) for four out of six tabular data sets in downstream classification tasks. Unlike dropout learning, the proposed weight perturbation routine additionally achieves 15% to 40% sparsity across six tabular data sets, resulting in compressed pretrained models. The proposed pretrained model compression improves the accuracy of downstream classification, unlike traditional weight pruning methods that trade off performance for model compression. Our experiments reveal that a pretrained deep autoencoder with weight perturbation can outperform traditional machine learning in tabular data classification, whereas baseline fully-connected DNNs yield the worst classification accuracy. However, traditional machine learning models are superior to any deep model when a tabular data set contains uncorrelated variables. Therefore, the performance of deep models with tabular data is contingent on the types and statistics of constituent variables.

Indexed as

Data CompressionNeural Networks, ComputerMachine LearningPhysical PhenomenaAutoencoderDeep neural networkModel compressionSparse learningTabular dataWeight pruning

Identifiers

PMID36270199
PMCPMC9669225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.