Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36270012›Full record

ReviewPM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation2023

Development of a candidate item bank for measuring mobility of lower limb orthosis users.

Geoffrey S Balkman, Sara J Morgan, Dagmar Amtmann, Carolyn Baylor, Brian J Hafner

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Geoffrey S BalkmanDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1087-4647
Sara J MorganDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8059-3659
Dagmar AmtmannDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1142-9729
Carolyn BaylorDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7185-7528
Brian J HafnerDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6175-1869
University of Washington · US

Funding

A Client-Based Outcome System for Individuals with Lower Limb AmputationR01HD065340 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HAFNER, BRIAN J · 2014 to 2022
$2.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD065340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOrthoses are often prescribed to improve mobility of people with chronic health conditions that affect lower limb function. Patient-reported survey instruments can be used to measure aspects of mobility that cannot be easily assessed in clinical or research settings. A population-specific item bank could be designed to measure aspects of mobility that are most important to lower limb orthosis users and used to evaluate the effects of orthoses.

objectiveTo develop items for a new survey instrument to measure mobility of lower limb orthosis users.

designSurvey items were developed using a qualitative item review process.

settingFocus groups were held by video conferencing. Cognitive interviews were conducted by telephone.

participantsFocus group and cognitive interview participants were adults with at least 6 months of experience using a lower limb orthosis that extended from the foot to a level above the ankle.

methodsResearch methods included focus groups with lower limb orthosis users, an item generation and reduction process that involved a stakeholder advisory panel, and cognitive interviews with target respondents.

resultsA total of 1180 extant items were identified in a literature review. Focus group participants (n = 29) provided feedback that informed the suitability of a construct definition and conceptual model. An advisory panel contributed to the selection of 118 candidate items for measuring orthotic mobility. Feedback from cognitive interview participants (n = 30) informed removal or revision of problematic items, resulting in a candidate bank of 100 mobility items.

conclusionsThe rigorous qualitative methods applied here resulted in a large set of candidate items that spanned a range of situations relevant to moving with a lower limb orthosis. Next steps include administration of the candidate items to a large sample of lower limb orthosis users and calibration of the item bank.

Indexed as

Lower ExtremityOrthotic DevicesAdultBracesFocus GroupsHumansSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID36270012
PMCPMC10119328
OpenAlexW4307042689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.