Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36269846›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2023

The impact of early PEG-asparaginase discontinuation in young adults with ALL: a post hoc analysis of the CALGB 10403 study.

Ibrahim Aldoss, Jun Yin, Anna Wall, Krzysztof Mrózek, Michaela Liedtke, David F Claxton, Matthew C Foster, Frederick R Appelbaum, Harry P Erba, Mark R Litzow and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Ibrahim AldossDepartment of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-9564-4498
Jun YinAlliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Anna WallAlliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Krzysztof MrózekThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Clara D. Bloomfield Center for Leukemia Outcomes Research, Columbus, OH.
Michaela LiedtkeDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-8945-5850
David F ClaxtonDepartment of Medicine, Penn State University, State College, PA.
Matthew C FosterDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Frederick R AppelbaumClinical Research Division, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
Harry P ErbaDepartment of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC.ORCID 0000-0003-1093-2189
Mark R LitzowDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-9816-6302
Martin S TallmanMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Richard M StoneDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Richard A LarsonUniversity of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL.ORCID 0000-0001-9168-3203
Anjali S AdvaniTaussig Cancer Institute/Leukemia Program, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.ORCID 0000-0003-0015-5902
Wendy StockDepartment of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Selina M LugerAbramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USUniversity of Chicago · USCity Of Hope National Medical Center · USCleveland Clinic · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USDuke University · USMayo Clinic · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USPennsylvania State University · USStanford University · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Member Site CoreU10CA180821 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Evanthia Galanis · 2014 to 2026
$177.3M
Project-006U10CA180820 · NCI · ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI Peter J ODwyer · 2014 to 2026
$167.6M
SWOG Network Group Operations Center of the NCTNU10CA180888 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI PRIMO N. LARA · 2014 to 2026
$152.1M
Statistics CoreU10CA180882 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Sumithra Jay Mandrekar · 2014 to 2026
$115.0M
Network Lead Academic Participating Site: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterUG1CA233290 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI CAROL AGHAJANIAN, Darren Feldman · 2019 to 2026
$10.2M
OSU as a Network Lead Academic Participating Site for the NCI NCTNUG1CA233331 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI John L. Hays, Dwight H. Owen · 2019 to 2026
$8.9M
NCTN Lead Academic Participating Site at Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer CareUG1CA233180 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI Harold John Burstein · 2019 to 2026
$8.6M
Hutchinson Center as Lead Academic Participating Site (UG1)UG1CA233328 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Evan Yu · 2019 to 2026
$4.3M
UNC Lead Academic Participating SiteUG1CA233373 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CAREY, LISA A, DEES, ELIZABETH CLAIRE · 2019 to 2025
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180820NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180821NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180882NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180888NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233180NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233290NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233328NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233331NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asparaginase is a key component of pediatric-inspired regimens in young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Truncation of asparaginase therapy is linked to inferior outcomes in children with ALL. However, a similar correlation in adults is lacking. Here, we studied the prevalence and risk factors associated with pegylated (PEG)-asparaginase discontinuation in young adults with ALL treated on the US intergroup Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 10403 study and examined the prognostic impact of early discontinuation (ED) (defined as <4 of 5 or 6 planned doses) on survival outcomes. The analysis included 176 patients who achieved complete remission and initiated the delayed intensification (DI) cycle. The median number of PEG-asparaginase doses administered before DI was 5 (range, 1-6), with 57 (32%) patients with ED. The ED patients were older (median, 26 vs 23 years; P = .023). Survival was apparently lower for ED patients compared with those receiving ≥4 doses, but this finding was not statistically significant (hazard ratio [HR], 1.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-3.43; P = .06), with corresponding 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of 66% and 80%, respectively. In patients with standard-risk ALL, the ED of PEG-asparaginase adversely influenced OS (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.02-5.22; P = .04) with a trend toward inferior event-free survival (EFS) (HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 0.92-3.67; P = .08). In contrast, there was no impact of early PEG-asparaginase discontinuation on OS (P = .64) or EFS (P = .32) in patients with high-risk disease based on the presence of high-risk cytogenetics, Ph-like genotype, and/or high white blood cell count at presentation. In conclusion, early PEG-asparaginase discontinuation is common in young adults with ALL and may adversely impact survival of patients with standard-risk ALL.

Indexed as

AsparaginasePrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaChildHumansPolyethylene GlycolsRemission InductionYoung AdultAsparaginasepegaspargasePolyethylene Glycols

Identifiers

PMID36269846
PMCPMC9841239
OpenAlexW4307038233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.