ArticlePloS one2022
Willingness to work in rural areas and associated factors among graduating health students at the University of Gondar, northwest Ethiopia, 2021.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMany of the rural areas in developing countries are still in need access to quality healthcare services. To ensure the fair distribution of a high-quality health workforce and the availability of health services, there is a need to assess the background barriers that explain why healthcare providers are not interested to work in rural areas, thereby setting strategies to achieve universal health coverage. Therefore, this study is aimed to assess the willingness to work in rural areas and associated factors among health students at the University of Gondar.
methodsAn institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted at the University of Gondar from August 15 to 25, 2021. A total of 422 study participants were selected using a stratified random sampling technique. A pretested self-administered questionnaire was employed to collect the data. Data were entered into EPI DATA 4.6 and exported to SPSS 25 for further analysis. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with students' willingness to work in rural areas. The level of significance was decided based on the 95% confidence interval at a p-value of ≤ 0.05.
resultsIn this study, it was found that health students' willingness to work in rural areas was 78.4% (95% CI: 74.3, 82.4). Being male (AOR = 2.15; 95% CI: 1.17, 3.94), having intention to continue with their profession (AOR = 2.5; 95% CI: 1.28, 4.86), having a favorable attitude towards working in rural areas (AOR = 7.32; 95% CI: 5.71, 18.65), and having a mother with no formal education (AOR = 2.23; 95% CI: 1.02, 4.85) and completed primary education (AOR = 2.69; 95% CI: 1.1, 6.61) were significantly associated with willingness to work in rural areas.
conclusionThe willingness of students to work in rural areas was optimal. This calls for concerned bodies to create a conducive environment for male and female students to engage in rural areas without hesitation. It is also important to ensure that students are willing to work in the rural areas voluntarily, instead of working in rural areas due to a lack of employment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.