Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36269765›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2022

Comprehensive characterization of the Hsp70 interactome reveals novel client proteins and interactions mediated by posttranslational modifications.

Nitika, Bo Zheng, Linhao Ruan, Jake T Kline, Siddhi Omkar, Jacek Sikora, Mara Texeira Torres, Yuhao Wang, Jade E Takakuwa, Romain Huguet and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. DnaJB1 chaperone inhibits tau aggregation by recognizing its N-terminus.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

NitikaDepartment of Biological Sciences, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States America.
Bo ZhengDepartment of Biological Sciences, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States America.
Linhao RuanCenter for Cell Dynamics and Department of Cell Biology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States America.
Jake T KlineDepartment of Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, United States America.
Siddhi OmkarDepartment of Biological Sciences, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States America.
Jacek SikoraDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, Department of Chemistry, and the Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, United States America.
Mara Texeira TorresSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University, London, United Kingdom.
Yuhao WangCenter for Cell Dynamics and Department of Cell Biology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States America.
Jade E TakakuwaDepartment of Biological Sciences, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States America.
Romain HuguetThermo Scientific, San Jose, California, United States America.
Cinzia KlemmSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University, London, United Kingdom.
Verónica A SegarraDepartments of Biological Sciences and Chemistry, Goucher College, Baltimore, Maryland, United States America.
Matthew J WintersDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States America.
Peter M PryciakDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States America.
Peter H ThorpeSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University, London, United Kingdom.
Kazuo TatebayashiLaboratory of Molecular Genetics, Frontier Research Unit, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Rong LiCenter for Cell Dynamics and Department of Cell Biology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States America.
Luca FornelliDepartment of Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, United States America.
Andrew W TrumanDepartment of Biological Sciences, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States America.ORCID 0000-0002-6409-3723
University of North Carolina at Charlotte · USJohns Hopkins University · USQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USUniversity of Oklahoma · USGoucher College · USNorthwestern University · USThermo Fisher Scientific (United States) · USThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

YEAST PHEROMONE SIGNAL TRANSDUCTIONR01GM057769 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI PRYCIAK, PETER M · 1997 to 2023
$7.6M
Understanding the reciprocal regulation between Hsp70 and the DNA damage response.R01GM139885 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE · PI TRUMAN, ANDREW WILLIAM · 2021 to 2024
$1.4M
Understanding ER chaperone-mediated RNR regulationR15GM139059 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE · PI TRUMAN, ANDREW WILLIAM · 2020 to 2020
$440k
Cancer Research UK FC001183Medical Research Council FC001183NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM057769NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM139885NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM139059Wellcome Trust FC001183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hsp70 interactions are critical for cellular viability and the response to stress. Previous attempts to characterize Hsp70 interactions have been limited by their transient nature and the inability of current technologies to distinguish direct versus bridged interactions. We report the novel use of cross-linking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) to comprehensively characterize the Saccharomyces cerevisiae (budding yeast) Hsp70 protein interactome. Using this approach, we have gained fundamental new insights into Hsp70 function, including definitive evidence of Hsp70 self-association as well as multipoint interaction with its client proteins. In addition to identifying a novel set of direct Hsp70 interactors that can be used to probe chaperone function in cells, we have also identified a suite of posttranslational modification (PTM)-associated Hsp70 interactions. The majority of these PTMs have not been previously reported and appear to be critical in the regulation of client protein function. These data indicate that one of the mechanisms by which PTMs contribute to protein function is by facilitating interaction with chaperones. Taken together, we propose that XL-MS analysis of chaperone complexes may be used as a unique way to identify biologically important PTMs on client proteins.

Indexed as

HSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsHumansMolecular ChaperonesProtein BindingProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalSaccharomyces cerevisiaeHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsMolecular ChaperonesSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID36269765
PMCPMC9629621
OpenAlexW4307002203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.