Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36269654›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2022

Lifting Hospital Electronic Health Record Data Treasures: Challenges and Opportunities.

Alexander Maletzky, Carl Böck, Thomas Tschoellitsch, Theresa Roland, Helga Ludwig, Stefan Thumfart, Michael Giretzlehner, Sepp Hochreiter, Jens Meier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Data Provenance in Biomedical Research: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alexander MaletzkyResearch Department Medical Informatics, RISC Software GmbH, Hagenberg, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4378-7854
Carl BöckJKU LIT SAL eSPML Lab, Institute of Signal Processing, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2207-2411
Thomas TschoellitschDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kepler University Hospital GmbH, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3350-7532
Theresa RolandELLIS Unit Linz, LIT AI Lab, Institute for Machine Learning, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7893-6146
Helga LudwigELLIS Unit Linz, LIT AI Lab, Institute for Machine Learning, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6004-1945
Stefan ThumfartResearch Department Medical Informatics, RISC Software GmbH, Hagenberg, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9838-3641
Michael GiretzlehnerResearch Department Medical Informatics, RISC Software GmbH, Hagenberg, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1620-1002
Sepp HochreiterELLIS Unit Linz, LIT AI Lab, Institute for Machine Learning, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7449-2528
Jens MeierDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kepler University Hospital GmbH, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8727-2257

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic health records (EHRs) have been successfully used in data science and machine learning projects. However, most of these data are collected for clinical use rather than for retrospective analysis. This means that researchers typically face many different issues when attempting to access and prepare the data for secondary use. We aimed to investigate how raw EHRs can be accessed and prepared in retrospective data science projects in a disciplined, effective, and efficient way. We report our experience and findings from a large-scale data science project analyzing routinely acquired retrospective data from the Kepler University Hospital in Linz, Austria. The project involved data collection from more than 150,000 patients over a period of 10 years. It included diverse data modalities, such as static demographic data, irregularly acquired laboratory test results, regularly sampled vital signs, and high-frequency physiological waveform signals. Raw medical data can be corrupted in many unexpected ways that demand thorough manual inspection and highly individualized data cleaning solutions. We present a general data preparation workflow, which was shaped in the course of our project and consists of the following 7 steps: obtain a rough overview of the available EHR data, define clinically meaningful labels for supervised learning, extract relevant data from the hospital's data warehouses, match data extracted from different sources, deidentify them, detect errors and inconsistencies therein through a careful exploratory analysis, and implement a suitable data processing pipeline in actual code. Only few of the data preparation issues encountered in our project were addressed by generic medical data preprocessing tools that have been proposed recently. Instead, highly individualized solutions for the specific data used in one's own research seem inevitable. We believe that the proposed workflow can serve as a guidance for practitioners, helping them to identify and address potential problems early and avoid some common pitfalls.

Indexed as

electronic health recordmachine learningmedical data preparationretrospective data analysis

Identifiers

PMID36269654
PMCPMC9636533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.