Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36269651›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

The Family Level Assessment of Screen Use-Mobile Approach: Development of an Approach to Measure Children's Mobile Device Use.

Oriana Perez, Anil Kumar Vadathya, Alicia Beltran, R Matthew Barnett, Olivia Hindera, Tatyana Garza, Salma M Musaad, Tom Baranowski, Sheryl O Hughes, Jason A Mendoza and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Oriana PerezUnited States Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Research Service Children's Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7111-7431
Anil Kumar VadathyaDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0517-0901
Alicia BeltranUnited States Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Research Service Children's Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3888-7500
R Matthew BarnettCenter for Research Computing, Rice University, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2375-2988
Olivia HinderaBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5042-195X
Tatyana GarzaUnited States Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Research Service Children's Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8198-3920
Salma M MusaadUnited States Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Research Service Children's Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1733-830X
Tom BaranowskiUnited States Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Research Service Children's Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0653-2222
Sheryl O HughesUnited States Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Research Service Children's Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0331-2494
Jason A MendozaPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0833-4358
Ashutosh SabharwalDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1898-5787
Ashok VeeraraghavanDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5043-7460
Teresia M O'ConnorUnited States Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Research Service Children's Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3231-8481
Agricultural Research Service · USRice University · USBaylor College of Medicine · USSeattle Children's Hospital · US

Funding

Development and Validation of an Automated Measurement of Child Screen Media Use: FLASHR01DK113269 · NIDDK · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI O'CONNOR, TERESIA MARGARETA, VEERARAGHAVAN, ASHOK · 2017 to 2021
$2.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK113269
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a strong association between increased mobile device use and worse dietary habits, worse sleep outcomes, and poor academic performance in children. Self-report or parent-proxy report of children's screen time has been the most common method of measuring screen time, which may be imprecise or biased.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of measuring the screen time of children on mobile devices using the Family Level Assessment of Screen Use (FLASH)-mobile approach, an innovative method that leverages the existing features of the Android platform.

methodsThis pilot study consisted of 2 laboratory-based observational feasibility studies and 2 home-based feasibility studies in the United States. A total of 48 parent-child dyads consisting of a parent and child aged 6 to 11 years participated in the pilot study. The children had to have their own or shared Android device. The laboratory-based studies included a standardized series of tasks while using the mobile device or watching television, which were video recorded. Video recordings were coded by staff for a gold standard comparison. The home-based studies instructed the parent-child dyads to use their mobile device as they typically use it over 3 days. Parents received a copy of the use logs at the end of the study and completed an exit interview in which they were asked to review their logs and share their perceptions and suggestions for the improvement of the FLASH-mobile approach.

resultsThe final version of the FLASH-mobile approach resulted in user identification compliance rates of >90% for smartphones and >80% for tablets. For laboratory-based studies, a mean agreement of 73.6% (SD 16.15%) was achieved compared with the gold standard (human coding of video recordings) in capturing the target child's mobile use. Qualitative feedback from parents and children revealed that parents found the FLASH-mobile approach useful for tracking how much time their child spends using the mobile device as well as tracking the apps they used. Some parents revealed concerns over privacy and provided suggestions for improving the FLASH-mobile approach.

conclusionsThe FLASH-mobile approach offers an important new research approach to measure children's use of mobile devices more accurately across several days, even when the child shares the device with other family members. With additional enhancement and validation studies, this approach can significantly advance the measurement of mobile device use among young children.

Indexed as

childrenmobile media appsmobile phonemobile phone usescreen timetablet use

Identifiers

PMID36269651
PMCPMC9636534
OpenAlexW4307033141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.