ArticleJMIR medical education2022
Perceptions of US Medical Students on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Mixed Methods Survey Study.
Article in JMIR medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Medical Students' Attitudes, Perceptions, and Self-Reported Familiarity With AI in Health Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR medical education · 2026Pooled it
- Is it time to introduce an artificial intelligence curriculum in undergraduate medical education? medical students' perspectives: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical education · 2026Pooled it
- Medical, dental, and nursing students' attitudes and knowledge towards artificial intelligence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical education · 2024Pooled it
- Assessment of drug harm by final-year medical students and ChatGPT - a comparative analysis.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2026Article
- From principle to practice: Developing a digital-age clinical artificial intelligence ethics competence framework through early-career doctors' experiences.Medical education · 2026Article
- AI literacy among healthcare professionals and students in the Americas.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Integration in U.S. Healthcare Professional Degree Programs: A Rapid Scoping Review.Research square · 2026Article
- AI in UK Medical Education: A Framework for Curriculum Reform.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Medical students' and faculty members' perceptions and experiences of AI integration in health care practice and in medical curricula: A meta-ethnographic review.Medical education · 2026Review
- Public Perceptions of AI in Medicine and Implications for Future Medical Education: Cross-Sectional Survey.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in the Internal Medicine Clerkship: Results of a National Survey.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Questionnaires on Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care Among Health Care Students: Cross-Cultural Translation Into French and Linguistic Validation.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Exploring health care learners' perceptions of AI integration in the curriculum: a survey tool and findings.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Dental students' knowledge, perceptions, and educational needs regarding artificial intelligence: a multinational cross-sectional survey.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Uptake of Large Language Models by London Medical Students: Exploratory Qualitative Interview Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Barriers, Solutions, and Strategies.HCA healthcare journal of medicine · 2026Article
- Postgraduate students' perceptions of artificial intelligence integration in research: A cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education clinical skills curricula: a scoping review of implementations since 2022.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education: an updated scoping review.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Generative AI as the First Patient: Practice, Feedback, and Confidence.Medical science educator · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGiven the rapidity with which artificial intelligence is gaining momentum in clinical medicine, current physician leaders have called for more incorporation of artificial intelligence topics into undergraduate medical education. This is to prepare future physicians to better work together with artificial intelligence technology. However, the first step in curriculum development is to survey the needs of end users. There has not been a study to determine which media and which topics are most preferred by US medical students to learn about the topic of artificial intelligence in medicine.
objectiveWe aimed to survey US medical students on the need to incorporate artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education and their preferred means to do so to assist with future education initiatives.
methodsA mixed methods survey comprising both specific questions and a write-in response section was sent through Qualtrics to US medical students in May 2021. Likert scale questions were used to first assess various perceptions of artificial intelligence in medicine. Specific questions were posed regarding learning format and topics in artificial intelligence.
resultsWe surveyed 390 US medical students with an average age of 26 (SD 3) years from 17 different medical programs (the estimated response rate was 3.5%). A majority (355/388, 91.5%) of respondents agreed that training in artificial intelligence concepts during medical school would be useful for their future. While 79.4% (308/388) were excited to use artificial intelligence technologies, 91.2% (353/387) either reported that their medical schools did not offer resources or were unsure if they did so. Short lectures (264/378, 69.8%), formal electives (180/378, 47.6%), and Q and A panels (167/378, 44.2%) were identified as preferred formats, while fundamental concepts of artificial intelligence (247/379, 65.2%), when to use artificial intelligence in medicine (227/379, 59.9%), and pros and cons of using artificial intelligence (224/379, 59.1%) were the most preferred topics for enhancing their training.
conclusionsThe results of this study indicate that current US medical students recognize the importance of artificial intelligence in medicine and acknowledge that current formal education and resources to study artificial intelligence-related topics are limited in most US medical schools. Respondents also indicated that a hybrid formal/flexible format would be most appropriate for incorporating artificial intelligence as a topic in US medical schools. Based on these data, we conclude that there is a definitive knowledge gap in artificial intelligence education within current medical education in the US. Further, the results suggest there is a disparity in opinions on the specific format and topics to be introduced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.