ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2022
An Update on Diagnostic Laboratory Biomarkers for Multiple Sclerosis.
Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Splicing-based biomarkers define a robust multigene classifier for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.Journal of translational autoimmunity · 2025Article
- Selected Serum Biomarkers in Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis-A 3-Year Prospective Pilot Study.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Multifaceted Biomarkers Suggest a Similar Profile of CNS Pathology in Relapsing and Progressive MS.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Misdiagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis: Past, Present, and Future.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2024Review
- NFL and GFAP in (pre)symptomatic RVCL-S carriers: a monogenic cerebral small vessel disease.Journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Article
- A Blood Test for the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Diagnostic potential of blood-based biomarkers in multiple sclerosis.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- A first step towards preventive medicine in multiple sclerosis.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2023Article
- Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers in Differential Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis and Systemic Inflammatory Diseases with Central Nervous System Involvement.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Biogenesis, Composition and Potential Therapeutic Applications of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived Exosomes in Various Diseases.International journal of nanomedicine · 2023Review
- Biomarkers in autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Cerebrospinal fluid oligoclonal bands in Chinese patients with multiple sclerosis: the prevalence and its association with clinical features.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFor many patients, the multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnostic process can be lengthy, costly, and fraught with error. Recent research aims to address the unmet need for an accurate and simple diagnostic process through discovery of novel diagnostic biomarkers. This review summarizes recent studies on MS diagnostic fluid biomarkers, with a focus on blood biomarkers, and includes discussion of technical limitations and practical applicability. RECENT
findingsThis line of research is in its early days. Accurate and easily obtainable biomarkers for MS have not yet been identified and validated, but several approaches to uncover them are underway. Continue efforts to define laboratory diagnostic biomarkers are likely to play an increasingly important role in defining MS at the earliest stages, leading to better long-term clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36269540What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.