Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36269514›Full record

ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2023

Comparison of the value of the STOP-BANG questionnaire with oxygen desaturation index in screening obstructive sleep apnea in Germany.

Yan Wang, Ingo Fietze, Matthew Salanitro, Thomas Penzel

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yan WangInterdisciplinary Sleep Medicine Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Luisenstrasse 13, 10117, Berlin, Germany. yan.wang@charite.de.ORCID 0000-0002-9848-4394
Ingo FietzeInterdisciplinary Sleep Medicine Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Luisenstrasse 13, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Matthew SalanitroInterdisciplinary Sleep Medicine Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Luisenstrasse 13, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Thomas PenzelInterdisciplinary Sleep Medicine Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Luisenstrasse 13, 10117, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4304-0112
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DESechenov University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite polysomnography being the gold standard method of diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), it is time-consuming and has long waiting lists. Alternative methods including questionnaires and portable sleep devices have been developed to increase the speed of diagnosis. However, most questionnaires such as the STOP-BANG questionnaire (SBQ) are limited due to low specificity. This study evaluated the value of SBQ to screen for OSA and compared it with the oxygen desaturation index (ODI) and their combination.

methodsThis retrospective study included patients who completed the SBQ and underwent a night at the sleep lab or home sleep testing. The ODI was extracted from these sleep study reports. The combination of SBQ with ODI and their individual scores were compared with apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) in terms of their accuracy in diagnosing OSA. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) for different severities of OSA were calculated and compared.

resultsAmong 132 patients, SBQ showed a sensitivity of 0.9 and a specificity of 0.3 to screen for OSA. As the severity of OSA increased, the sensitivity increased whilst specificity decreased for both measurements. ODI achieved an increased specificity of 0.8 and could correctly diagnose OSA 86% of the time which was better than SBQ's 60%. For all severities of OSA, ODI alone displayed a larger AUC than SBQ and similar AUC to their combination.

conclusionODI produced a higher specificity and AUC than SBQ. Furthermore, ODI combined with SBQ failed to increase diagnostic value. Therefore, ODI may be the preferred way to initially screen patients for OSA as an easy-to-use alternative compared to SBQ.

Indexed as

OxygenSleep Apnea, ObstructiveGermanyHumansMass ScreeningRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesOxygenApnea–hypopnea indexObstructive sleep apneaOxygen saturation indexSTOP-Bang questionnaire

Identifiers

PMID36269514
PMCPMC10427704
OpenAlexW4307035017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.