Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36269498›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2022

Impact of a Community Health Worker (CHW) Home Visiting Intervention on Any and Adequate Prenatal Care Among Ethno-Racially Diverse Pregnant Women of the US Southwest.

Kelly McCue, Samantha Sabo, Patrick Wightman, Matthew Butler, Vern Pilling, Dulce Jiménez, Rebecca Annorbah, Sara Rumann

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. State-of-the-Art Review: Congenital Syphilis in the Modern Era: Current Strategies and Future Directions.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kelly McCueNorthern Arizona University Center for Health Equity Research, PO Box 4065, 86001, Flagstaff, AZ, USA. kelly.mccue@nau.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8383-0338
Samantha SaboNorthern Arizona University Center for Health Equity Research, PO Box 4065, 86001, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Patrick WightmanUniversity of Arizona Center for Population Science and Discovery, P.O. Box 245024, 85724, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Matthew ButlerDepartment of Economics, Brigham Young University, 435 Crabtree Technology Building, 84602, Provo, UT, USA.
Vern PillingUniversity of Arizona Center for Biomedical Informatics and Biostatistics, PO Box 210242, 85721, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Dulce JiménezNorthern Arizona University Center for Health Equity Research, PO Box 4065, 86001, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Rebecca AnnorbahNorthern Arizona University Center for Health Equity Research, PO Box 4065, 86001, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Sara RumannArizona Department of Health Services, Bureau of Women's and Children's Health, 150 North 18th Avenue, Suite 320, 85007, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Northern Arizona University · USUniversity of Arizona · USArizona Department of Health Services · USBrigham Young University · US

Funding

Arizona Department of Health Services Arizona Department of Health ServicesMaternal and Child Health Bureau Maternal and Child Health Bureau
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSocial and structural barriers drive disparities in prenatal care utilization among minoritized women in the United States. This study examined the impact of Arizona's Health Start Program, a community health worker (CHW) home visiting intervention, on prenatal care utilization among an ethno-racially and geographically diverse cohort of women.

methodsWe used Health Start administrative and state birth certificate data to identify women enrolled in the program during 2006-2016 (n = 7,117). Propensity score matching was used to generate a statistically-similar comparison group (n = 53,213) of women who did not participate in the program. Odds ratios were used to compare rates of prenatal care utilization. The process was repeated for select subgroups, with post-match regression adjustments applied where necessary.

resultsHealth Start participants were more likely to report any (OR 1.24, 95%CI 1.02-1.50) and adequate (OR 1.08, 95%CI 1.01-1.16) prenatal care, compared to controls. Additional specific subgroups were significantly more likely to receive any prenatal care: American Indian women (OR 2.22, 95%CI 1.07-4.60), primipara women (OR 1.64, 95%CI 1.13-2.38), teens (OR 1.58, 95%CI 1.02-2.45), women in rural border counties (OR 1.45, 95%CI 1.05-1.98); and adequate prenatal care: teens (OR 1.31, 95%CI 1.11-1.55), women in rural border counties (OR 1.18, 95%CI 1.05-1.33), primipara women (OR 1.18, 95%CI 1.05-1.32), women with less than high school education (OR 1.13, 95%CI 1.00-1.27). CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: A CHW-led perinatal home visiting intervention operated through a state health department can improve prenatal care utilization among demographically and socioeconomically disadvantaged women and reduce maternal and child health inequity.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersPrenatal CareAdolescentChildFemaleHouse CallsHumansParturitionPregnancyPregnant PeopleUnited Statescommunity health workerHome visitingprenatal carepropensity score matching

Identifiers

PMID36269498
PMCPMC9747829
OpenAlexW4306937276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.