Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36269465›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of bipolar disorders2022

Efficacy and safety of adjunctive therapy to lamotrigine, lithium, or valproate monotherapy in bipolar depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Taku Maruki, Tomohiro Utsumi, Masahiro Takeshima, Yu Fujiwara, Marie Matsui, Yumi Aoki, Hiroyuki Toda, Norio Watanabe, Koichiro Watanabe, Yoshikazu Takaesu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of bipolar disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Taku MarukiDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomohiro UtsumiDepartment of Psychiatry, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Masahiro TakeshimaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Yu FujiwaraDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, National Defense Medical College, Saitama, Japan.
Marie MatsuiDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, National Defense Medical College, Saitama, Japan.
Yumi AokiPsychiatric & Mental Health Nursing, Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki TodaDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, National Defense Medical College, Saitama, Japan.
Norio WatanabeDepartment of Psychiatry, Soseikai General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Koichiro WatanabeDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshikazu TakaesuDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. takaesuy@med.u-ryukyu.ac.jp.
National Defense Medical College · JPKyorin University · JPAkita University · JPJikei University School of Medicine · JPSt. Luke's International University · JPUniversity of the Ryukyus · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe efficacy and safety of adjunctive therapy are unclear in bipolar depression. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of second-generation antipsychotic, lamotrigine, lithium, or valproate therapy used in adjunction with lamotrigine, lithium, or valproate monotherapy in bipolar depression. A literature search of major electronic databases was conducted in February 2021, and all articles published until then were eligible. Two researchers independently screened relevant publications, extracted data, and evaluated methodological quality according to the Cochrane criteria.

resultsFive studies met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed significant differences in the following outcomes: (i) remission rates from depressive episodes (risk ratio [RR]: 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.50, p = 0.04), (ii) improvement in depressive symptoms (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 0.21, 95% CI 0.09-0.34, p = 0.001), (iii) improvement in quality of life (SMD: 0.22, 95% CI 0.06-0.37, p = 0.005), and (iv) rate of adverse events during the study period (RR: 1.12, 95% CI 1.03-1.22, p = 0.008). There was no significant difference between adjunctive therapy and monotherapy in the emergence of suicide-related behaviors, dropout rate during the study period, or rate of manic switching.

conclusionsOur results suggest that adjunctive second-generation antipsychotics, lamotrigine, lithium, or valproate increase both the benefits and risks in patients with bipolar depression, although there is no significant difference in severe adverse events. Adjunctive therapy should be provided through shared decision-making while considering the patients' condition in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic drugBipolar depressionLamotrigineLithiumTreatment-resistant depression

Identifiers

PMID36269465
PMCPMC9587199
OpenAlexW4307036813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.