ArticleCurrent microbiology2022
Study of the Antimicrobial Potential of Actinomycetes Isolated from Organic and Inorganic Waste.
Article in Current microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Biocontrol of plant pathogens by actinomycetes: a bibliometric analysis and systematic review.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The main objective of this investigation was to characterize a collection of actinomycetes strains isolated from unexplored polluted ecosystems and to evaluate their antimicrobial potential in order to discover interesting bioactive compounds. Based on morphological and culture characters, 32 different strains were isolated: 20 strains from compost heap, seven strains from manure, and five strains from waste water. As expected, the genus Streptomyces was the most prevalent followed by the genus Micromonospora. Analysis of the antimicrobial activities of the isolated strains showed that those from compost heap were more efficient against the tested microorganisms (Candida albicans, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus aureus, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli). Several bioactive compounds were identified by liquid chromatography (LC) combined with mass spectrometry (MS) and then analyzed by both MEDINA's database, which contains the most common secondary metabolites, and Dictionary of Natural Products Chapman & Hall. Many interesting well-known and unknown biomolecules were identified. Quinomycin A and Daidzein were the most fascinating compounds isolated, respectively, by Streptomyces sp. WW2 and Streptomyces sp. WW4. The most active strain was identified based on 16S rDNA's sequences and it seems to be a new strain. The crude extract of the strain CH12 was analyzed and the UV absorption spectra and mass spectra (MS) of the main active compound were reported. It's an interesting compound (possible purpuromycin) with the molecular formula C26H18O13.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36269434What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.