Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36269338›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2022

Association of Hospice Payer With Concurrent Receipt of Hospice and Dialysis Among US Veterans With End-stage Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Analysis of a National Cohort.

Melissa W Wachterman, Emily E Corneau, Ann M O'Hare, Nancy L Keating, Vincent Mor

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Errors in Results.JAMA health forum · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa W WachtermanSection of General Internal Medicine, Veterans Affairs Boston Health Care System, Boston, Massachusetts.
Emily E CorneauLong Term Services and Supports Center of Innovation, Veterans Affairs Providence Health Care System, Providence, Rhode Island.
Ann M O'HareDepartment of Medicine and Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle.
Nancy L KeatingDivision of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Vincent MorLong Term Services and Supports Center of Innovation, Veterans Affairs Providence Health Care System, Providence, Rhode Island.
Providence College · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USVA Boston Healthcare System · USVA Puget Sound Health Care System · US

Funding

Deciding about Dialysis: Improving Decision-Making Among Older Adults with ESRDK23AG049088 · NIA · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI WACHTERMAN, MELISSA · 2015 to 2022
$919k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG049088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: For many patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), the Medicare Hospice Benefit precludes concurrent receipt of hospice and dialysis services, forcing patients to choose between continuing dialysis or enrolling in hospice. Whether the more liberal hospice eligibility criteria of the Veterans Health Administration's (VA) are associated with improved access to concurrent dialysis and hospice care for patients with ESKD is not known. Objective: To examine the frequency of concurrent hospice and dialysis care among US veterans by hospice payer and examine the payer for concurrent dialysis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of all 70 577 VA enrollees in the US Renal Data System registry who initiated maintenance dialysis and died in 2007 to 2016. Data were analyzed from April 2021 to August 2022. Exposures: Hospice payer, either Medicare, VA inpatient hospice, or VA-financed community-based hospice ("VA community care"). Primary hospice diagnosis-ESKD vs non-ESKD. Main Outcomes and Measures: Concurrent receipt of hospice and dialysis services ("concurrent care"). Results: There were 18 420 (26%) eligible veterans with ESKD who received hospice services (mean [SD] age, 75.4 [10.0] years; 17 457 [94.8%] men; 2997 [16.3%] Black, 15 162 [82.3%] White, and 261 (1.4%) individuals of other races). Most of the sample (n = 16 465; 89%) received hospice services under Medicare and 5231 (28%) continued to receive dialysis after hospice initiation. The adjusted proportion of veterans receiving concurrent care was higher for those enrolled in VA inpatient hospice or VA community care hospice than it was for those enrolled in Medicare hospice (57% and 41% vs 24%, respectively; both P < .001). Regardless of hospice payer, the majority (87%) of the dialysis treatments after hospice initiation were financed by the VA, including for Medicare beneficiaries who had a hospice diagnosis other than ESKD. Median hospice length of stay was 43 days for veterans who received concurrent dialysis vs 4 days for those who did not. Conclusions and Relevance: In this retrospective cross-sectional study of US veterans with ESKD, a substantially higher proportion of veterans in VA-financed hospice received 1 or more dialysis treatments after hospice initiation than those enrolled in Medicare-financed hospice. Regardless of hospice payer, the VA financed most concurrent dialysis treatments. Hospice users who received concurrent dialysis care had substantially longer hospice lengths of stay than those who did not. These findings suggest that Medicare hospice policy may substantially restrict access to concurrent hospice and dialysis care among veterans with ESKD.

Indexed as

Hospice CareHospicesKidney Failure, ChronicVeteransAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMedicareRenal DialysisRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID36269338
PMCPMC9587478
OpenAlexW4307033898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.