ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2022
[What potential and added value do DiGA offer for primary care?-Results of a survey of general practitioners in Germany].
Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prescriber's Preferences for Digital Health Applications in Mental Health Care: Cross-Sectional Best-Worst Scaling Study of General Practitioners and Psychotherapists in Germany.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- [Implementation and benefits of healthcare apps in surgical disciplines-A Delphi expert consensus].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- General Practitioners' Perspectives on Digital Health Applications for Mental Disorders and Their Prescribing Behavior: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR mental health · 2026Article
- Prescribing Experiences, Potentials, and Challenges of Digital Health Applications in the Field of Hormones and Metabolism: Cross-Sectional Survey Study of Health Care Providers in Germany.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Genie in the bottle? a qualitative study of general practitioners' perspectives and information needs concerning digital mental health applications in Germany.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- [Status quo and experience of primary care providers with regard to the counseling and management of obesity - Results of a quantitative-exploratory survey of general practitioners in Germany].Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2025Article
- Prerequisites for primary care in obesity counselling and management: a quantitative, exploratory survey of general practitioners in the federal Republic of Germany.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Article
- Unpacking Performance Factors of Innovation Systems and Studying Germany's Attempt to Foster the Role of the Patient Through a Market Access Pathway for Digital Health Applications (DiGAs): Exploratory Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Characteristic of mental health app usage: a cross-sectional survey in the general population.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Enhancing Digital Health Awareness and mHealth Competencies in Medical Education: Proof-of-Concept Study and Summative Process Evaluation of a Quality Improvement Project.JMIR medical education · 2024Article
- Mental health apps within the healthcare system: associations with stigma and mental health literacy.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2024Article
- Understanding inherent influencing factors to digital health adoption in general practices through a mixed-methods analysis.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- [Transparency and Efficiency through Digital Healthcare? Results of a Survey of Generation Y].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2024Article
- Attitudes and experiences of registered diabetes specialists in using health apps for managing type 2 diabetes: results from a mixed-methods study in Germany 2021/2022.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2023Article
- Rapid review on the incentives of digital health apps for physicians and psychotherapists: A German perspective.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFor almost two years, physicians have been able to prescribe digital health applications (DiGA) to patients. So far, there has been a lack of studies that shed light on the possible use of DiGA in the context of primary care and take stock of the benefits and potential for optimization.
objectivesThis study explores general practitioners' (GPs) attitudes, expectations, and experiences with regard to the application potential of DiGA.
methodsIn the spring of 2022, all 13,913 general practitioners in the federal states Baden-Württemberg, Hesse, Rhineland-Palatinate, and Saarland were invited to take part in an online survey. Included in the evaluation were 3829 completed questionnaires (response rate: 28%). A t-test on independent samples was used to determine significant differences between two groups. Moreover, a factor analysis was carried out.
resultsA majority of those surveyed consider DiGA to be reliable (67%) and secure (61%) applications. In addition, 22% trust themselves to competently advise patients on DiGA, 14% have already prescribed DiGA, and 13% plan to do so. Of the GPs with DiGA experience, 83% rate the prescribed applications as useful. Observed healthcare effects mainly relate to the improvement of compliance (95%), mobility (94%), and education (93%) as well as weight reduction (82%). The respondents suggest further optimization of DIGA, especially with regard to usability (59%), systematic further training of doctors (52%), and the expansion of gamification elements (49%).
conclusionsIt is important to better inform GPs about the basics of the Digital Healthcare Act (DVG) and to address concerns in a targeted manner. Comprehensive training courses that explain the framework conditions and advantages of using DiGA appear to be crucial. There is also a need for more well-founded sources of information and research for doctors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.