Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36269336›Full record

ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2022

[What potential and added value do DiGA offer for primary care?-Results of a survey of general practitioners in Germany].

Julian Wangler, Michael Jansky

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Mental health apps within the healthcare system: associations with stigma and mental health literacy.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. [Transparency and Efficiency through Digital Healthcare? Results of a Survey of Generation Y].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Julian WanglerZentrum für Allgemeinmedizin und Geriatrie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Am Pulverturm 13, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland. julian.wangler@unimedizin-mainz.de.
Michael JanskyZentrum für Allgemeinmedizin und Geriatrie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Am Pulverturm 13, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor almost two years, physicians have been able to prescribe digital health applications (DiGA) to patients. So far, there has been a lack of studies that shed light on the possible use of DiGA in the context of primary care and take stock of the benefits and potential for optimization.

objectivesThis study explores general practitioners' (GPs) attitudes, expectations, and experiences with regard to the application potential of DiGA.

methodsIn the spring of 2022, all 13,913 general practitioners in the federal states Baden-Württemberg, Hesse, Rhineland-Palatinate, and Saarland were invited to take part in an online survey. Included in the evaluation were 3829 completed questionnaires (response rate: 28%). A t-test on independent samples was used to determine significant differences between two groups. Moreover, a factor analysis was carried out.

resultsA majority of those surveyed consider DiGA to be reliable (67%) and secure (61%) applications. In addition, 22% trust themselves to competently advise patients on DiGA, 14% have already prescribed DiGA, and 13% plan to do so. Of the GPs with DiGA experience, 83% rate the prescribed applications as useful. Observed healthcare effects mainly relate to the improvement of compliance (95%), mobility (94%), and education (93%) as well as weight reduction (82%). The respondents suggest further optimization of DIGA, especially with regard to usability (59%), systematic further training of doctors (52%), and the expansion of gamification elements (49%).

conclusionsIt is important to better inform GPs about the basics of the Digital Healthcare Act (DVG) and to address concerns in a targeted manner. Comprehensive training courses that explain the framework conditions and advantages of using DiGA appear to be crucial. There is also a need for more well-founded sources of information and research for doctors.

Indexed as

General PractitionersGermanyHumansPrimary Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesDiGADigital health applicationsGeneral practitionerHealth appsHealth promotionMHealthPrevention

Identifiers

PMID36269336
PMCPMC9722862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.