Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36269104›Full record

ArticleNMR in biomedicine2023

Arterial spin labeling signal in the CSF: Implications for partial volume correction and blood-CSF barrier characterization.

Léonie Petitclerc, Lydiane Hirschler, Balázs Örzsik, Iris Asllani, Matthias J P van Osch

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Low b-value Diffusion Tensor Imaging to Analyze the Dynamics of Cerebrospinal Fluid: Resolving Intravoxel Pseudorandom Motion into Ordered and Disordered Motions.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Léonie PetitclercC.J. Gorter MRI Center, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9127-2201
Lydiane HirschlerC.J. Gorter MRI Center, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Balázs ÖrzsikClinical Imaging Science Center, Department of Neuroscience, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Iris AsllaniClinical Imaging Science Center, Department of Neuroscience, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Matthias J P van OschC.J. Gorter MRI Center, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLRochester Institute of Technology · USUniversity of Sussex · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For better quantification of perfusion with arterial spin labeling (ASL), partial volume correction (PVC) is used to disentangle the signals from gray matter (GM) and white matter within any voxel. Based on physiological considerations, PVC algorithms typically assume zero signal in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Recent measurements, however, have shown that CSF-ASL signal can exceed 10% of GM signal, even when using recommended ASL labeling parameters. CSF signal is expected to particularly affect PVC results in the choroid plexus. This study aims to measure the impact of CSF signal on PVC perfusion measurements, and to investigate the potential use of PVC to retrieve pure CSF-ASL signal for blood-CSF barrier characterization. In vivo imaging included six pCASL sequences with variable label duration and post-labeling delay (PLD), and an eight-echo 3D-GRASE readout. A dataset was simulated to estimate the effect of CSF-PVC with known ground-truth parameters. Differences between the results of CSF-PVC and non-CSF-PVC were estimated for regions of interest (ROIs) based on GM probability, and a separate ROI isolating the choroid plexus. In vivo, the suitability of PVC-CSF signal as an estimate of pure CSF was investigated by comparing its time course with the long-TE CSF signal. Results from both simulation and in vivo data indicated that including the CSF signal in PVC improves quantification of GM CBF by approximately 10%. In simulated data, this improvement was greater for multi-PLD (model fitting) quantification than for single PLD (~1-5% difference). In the choroid plexus, the difference between CSF-PVC and non-CSF-PVC was much larger, averaging around 30%. Long-TE (pure) CSF signal could not be estimated from PVC CSF signal as it followed a different time course, indicating the presence of residual macrovascular signal in the PVC. The inclusion of CSF adds value to PVC for more accurate measurements of GM perfusion, and especially for quantification of perfusion in the choroid plexus and study of the glymphatic system.

Indexed as

BrainCerebrovascular CirculationGray MatterMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMagnetic Resonance ImagingSpin LabelsSpin Labelsarterial spin labelingblood-CSF barrierbrain clearanceglymphaticsneurofluidspartial volume correction

Identifiers

PMID36269104
PMCPMC10078195
OpenAlexW4307031700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.