Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36269094›Full record

ReviewHealth & social care in the community2022

Interprofessional collaboration between social workers and community health workers to address health and mental health in the United States: A systematised review.

Lailea Noel, Qi Chen, Liana J Petruzzi, Farya Phillips, Ricardo Garay, Carmen Valdez, María P Aranda, Barbara Jones

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health & social care in the community, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Social determinants of health and hospitalization risk in heart failure: A Retrospective analysis.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Perspectives of Advance Care Planning for Latinos During COVID-19.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lailea NoelSteve Hicks School of Social Work at the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
Qi ChenSteve Hicks School of Social Work at the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
Liana J PetruzziSteve Hicks School of Social Work at the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
Farya PhillipsSteve Hicks School of Social Work at the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
Ricardo GarayDell Medical School, Population Health, Austin, Texas, USA.
Carmen ValdezSteve Hicks School of Social Work at the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
María P ArandaUniversity of Southern California Susanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Barbara JonesSteve Hicks School of Social Work at the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
The University of Texas at Austin · USDell Children's Medical Center of Central Texas · USDELL (United States) · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

USCADRC Diversity Supplement PachicanoP30AG066530 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI HELENA Chang CHUI, ARTHUR W TOGA · 2020 to 2026
$27.8M
Scientific & Technical CoreP2CHD042849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MARK D. HAYWARD · 2017 to 2026
$5.2M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066530NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collaboration between social workers (SW) and community health workers (CHW) plays an essential role in addressing health inequities in the United States (US). However, little is known about the current state of CHW/SW collaboration. The objectives of this review were to identify (a) the nature, goals and setting of CHWs and SW collaboration; (b) the patient outcomes utilised to measure intervention efficacy. The literature search was conducted in December 2020 using six databases. The inclusion criteria were (1) interventions that included CHWs and SWs; (2) US-based; (3) published between 2000-2020; (4) peer-reviewed journal articles; (5) examining health or mental health outcomes. Search results identified 281 articles, and 15 were included in the final analysis. Settings that utilised SW/CHW collaboration included outpatient clinics (n = 10); community organisations (n = 4) or hospital (n = 1). CHW and SW interventions focused on disease prevention (n = 8), chronic care (n = 4) and mental health (n = 3). Health outcomes were the most evaluated (n = 13), and significant improvement of at least one health outcome was reported in those studies. Mental health outcomes (n = 3) were also significantly improved, while social determinants of health (n = 2) were least common and descriptive only. This is the first review of SW and CHW collaboration. Clarity regarding SW and CHW roles and scopes of practice are needed to understand better SW/CHW collaboration and its impacts on community health outcomes and improve the process of collaboration. SW and CHW collaboration may increase clients' access to preventive care, mental health and address health inequities.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersSocial WorkersDelivery of Health CareHumansMental HealthUnited Statescommunity healthcommunity health workerhealth equitysocial determinants of healthsocial work

Identifiers

PMID36269094
PMCPMC10675993
OpenAlexW4307034118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.