Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36269057›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

Landscape of epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity as an emergent property of coordinated teams in regulatory networks.

Kishore Hari, Varun Ullanat, Archana Balasubramanian, Aditi Gopalan, Mohit Kumar Jolly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. A computational approach for perturbation-induced EMT transitions.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Fluctuation structure predicts genome-wide perturbation outcomes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kishore HariCentre for BioSystems Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5655-9039
Varun UllanatDepartment of Biotechnology, RV College of Engineering, Bangalore, India.
Archana BalasubramanianDepartment of Biotechnology, PES University, Bangalore, India.
Aditi GopalanDepartment of Biotechnology, RV College of Engineering, Bangalore, India.
Mohit Kumar JollyCentre for BioSystems Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6631-2109

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elucidating the design principles of regulatory networks driving cellular decision-making has fundamental implications in mapping and eventually controlling cell-fate decisions. Despite being complex, these regulatory networks often only give rise to a few phenotypes. Previously, we identified two 'teams' of nodes in a small cell lung cancer regulatory network that constrained the phenotypic repertoire and aligned strongly with the dominant phenotypes obtained from network simulations (Chauhan et al., 2021). However, it remained elusive whether these 'teams' exist in other networks, and how do they shape the phenotypic landscape. Here, we demonstrate that five different networks of varying sizes governing epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity comprised of two 'teams' of players - one comprised of canonical drivers of epithelial phenotype and the other containing the mesenchymal inducers. These 'teams' are specific to the topology of these regulatory networks and orchestrate a bimodal phenotypic landscape with the epithelial and mesenchymal phenotypes being more frequent and dynamically robust to perturbations, relative to the intermediary/hybrid epithelial/mesenchymal ones. Our analysis reveals that network topology alone can contain information about corresponding phenotypic distributions, thus obviating the need to simulate them. We propose 'teams' of nodes as a network design principle that can drive cell-fate canalization in diverse decision-making processes.

Indexed as

Epithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionGene Regulatory NetworksCell DifferentiationPhenotypecellular decision-makingcomplexitycomputational biologyepithelial–mesenchymal plasticitynetwork topologynonephenotypic heterogeneityphysics of living systemsrobustnesssystems biology

Identifiers

PMID36269057
PMCPMC9683792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.