Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36268814›Full record

ArticleAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2022

Post-Roe emergency medicine: Policy, clinical, training, and individual implications for emergency clinicians.

Margaret E Samuels-Kalow, Pooja Agrawal, Giovanni Rodriguez, Amy Zeidan, Jennifer S Love, Derek Monette, Michelle Lin, Richelle J Cooper, Tracy E Madsen, Valerie Dobiesz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Impact of Abortion Bans on Emergency Care for Patients With Vaginal Bleeding: An Ethnographic Analysis.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Margaret E Samuels-KalowDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0576-8903
Pooja AgrawalDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4727-555X
Giovanni RodriguezDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Amy ZeidanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jennifer S LoveDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5882-4390
Derek MonetteDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6275-704X
Michelle LinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6045-7342
Richelle J CooperDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Tracy E MadsenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Alpert Medial School of Brown University, Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5101-0776
Valerie DobieszDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Harvard University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USBrown University · USEmory University · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USStanford University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USYale University · US

Funding

Mount Sinai Clinician Scientist Training Program in Emergency Care ResearchT32HL129974 · NHLBI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI RICHARDSON, LYNNE D. · 2016 to 2020
$2.3M
Mount Sinai Clinician Scientist Training Program in Emergency Care ResearchT32HL160513 · NHLBI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Lynne D. Richardson · 2022 to 2026
$2.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL129974NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL160513
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In June 2022, the United States Supreme Court decision Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization overturned Roe v. Wade, removing almost 50 years of precedent and enabling the imposition of a wide range of state-level restrictions on abortion access. Historical data from the United States and internationally demonstrate that the removal of safe abortion options will increase complications and the health risks to pregnant patients. Because the emergency department is a critical access point for reproductive health care, emergency clinicians must be prepared for the policy, clinical, educational, and legal implications of this change. The goal of this paper, therefore, is to describe the impact of the reversal of Roe v. Wade on health equity and reproductive justice, the provision of emergency care education and training, and the specific legal and reproductive consequences for emergency clinicians. Finally, we conclude with specific recommended policy and advocacy responses for emergency medicine clinicians.

Indexed as

Abortion, LegalEmergency MedicineFemaleHumansPolicyPregnancySupreme Court DecisionsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID36268814
PMCPMC9772035
OpenAlexW4307033745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.