Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36268693›Full record

ReviewObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity2022

Newspaper media framing of obesity during pregnancy in the UK: A review and framework synthesis.

Nicola Heslehurst, Elizabeth H Evans, Angela C Incollingo Rodriguez, Taniya S Nagpal, Shelina Visram

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Weight stigma in the preconception, pregnancy, and postpartum periods: A systematic review of women's perspectives.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Changing the global obesity narrative to recognize and reduce weight stigma: A position statement from the World Obesity Federation.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Newspaper media framing of obesity during pregnancy in the UK: A review and framework synthesis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicola HeslehurstPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8656-2319
Elizabeth H EvansPsychology Department, Durham University, Durham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3432-3778
Angela C Incollingo RodriguezPsychological and Cognitive Sciences, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1609-4163
Taniya S NagpalFaculty of Kinesiology, Sport and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1928-1861
Shelina VisramPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K02325X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two thirds of women report experiencing weight stigma during pregnancy. Newspaper media is powerful in framing health issues. This review synthesized UK newspaper media portrayal of maternal obesity. NexisUni was searched to identify newspaper articles, published January 2010 to May 2021, reporting content on obesity during pregnancy. Framework synthesis integrated quantitative and qualitative analysis of the content of articles. There were 442 articles included (59% tabloids and 41% broadsheets). Three overarching themes with interacting sub-themes were as follows: (1) Women were blamed for their weight, risks, and NHS impact. (2) Women were solely responsible for solving obesity, gendered from school age. (3) Women with obesity were a burden on individuals (e.g., themselves, their children, and health professionals), to society, and the NHS. Catastrophizing language framed the "problem," "scale," and "public health concern" of maternal obesity, emphasizing risk, and danger and was alarmist, aggressive, and violent as to elicit fear or devalue women. Articles platformed 'expert' voices rather than women's lived experiences. This review identified that UK newspaper media negatively frames and oversimplifies the topic of maternal obesity. Exposure to blaming and alarmist messaging could increase women's guilt, stigma, and internalized weight bias. The newspaper media should be harnessed to de-stigmatize maternal obesity and promote maternal well-being.

Indexed as

Pregnancy in ObesityChildFemaleHumansObesityPregnancyPublic HealthSocial StigmaUnited Kingdommediaobesitypregnancystigma

Identifiers

PMID36268693
PMCPMC9788256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.