Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36268601›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2023

Experimental water hyacinth invasion and destructive management increase human schistosome transmission potential.

Daniel J Desautels, Rachel B Hartman, Maggie E Weber, Nathan Jacob, Andrew Sun, David J Civitello

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Experimental water hyacinth invasion and destructive management increase human schistosome transmission potential.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel J DesautelsDepartment of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Rachel B HartmanDepartment of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Maggie E WeberDepartment of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Nathan JacobDepartment of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Andrew SunDepartment of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
David J CivitelloDepartment of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8394-6288
Emory University · US

Funding

Resource competition drives natural and rebound dynamics of snails and schistosomesR01AI150774 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI CIVITELLO, DAVID JAMES · 2020 to 2025
$1.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI150774NINR NIH HHS L60 NR021970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive species cause environmental degradation, decrease biodiversity, and alter ecosystem function. Invasions can also drive changes in vector-borne and zoonotic diseases by altering important traits of wildlife hosts or disease vectors. Managing invasive species can restore biodiversity and ecosystem function, but it may have cascading effects on hosts, parasites, and human risk of infection. Water hyacinth, Eichhornia crassipes, is an extremely detrimental invader in many sites of human schistosome transmission, especially in Lake Victoria, where hyacinth is correlated with high snail abundance and hotspots of human schistosome infection. Hyacinth is often managed via removal or in situ destruction, but the effects of these strategies on snail intermediate hosts and schistosomes are not known. We evaluated the effects of water hyacinth invasion and these management strategies on the dynamics of human schistosomes, Schistosoma mansoni, and snails, Biomphalaria glabrata, in experimental mesocosms over 17 weeks. We hypothesized that hyacinth, which is inedible to snails, would affect snail growth, reproduction, and cercariae production through the balance of its competitive effects on edible algae and its production of edible detritus. We predicted that destruction would create a pulse of edible detrital resources, thereby increasing snail growth, reproduction, and parasite production. Conversely, we predicted that removal would have small or negligible effects on snails and schistosomes, because it would alleviate competition on edible algae without generating a resource pulse. We found that hyacinth invasion suppressed algae, changed the timing of peak snail abundance, and increased total production of human-infectious cercariae ~6-fold relative to uninvaded controls. Hyacinth management had complex effects on algae, snails, and schistosomes. Removal increased algal growth and snail abundance (but not biomass), and slightly reduced schistosome production. In contrast, destruction increased snail biomass (but not abundance), indicating increases in body size. Destruction caused the greatest schistosome production (10-fold more than the control), consistent with evidence that larger snails with greater access to food are most infectious. Our results highlight the dynamic effects of invasion and management on a globally impactful human parasite and its intermediate host. Ultimately, preventing or removing hyacinth invasions would simultaneously benefit human and environmental health outcomes.

Indexed as

BiomphalariaEichhorniaAnimalsCercariaEcosystemHost-Parasite InteractionsHumansPlantsSchistosoma mansoniSnailsinedible plantintermediate hostinvasive species managementpopulation dynamicsresource competitionschistosomes

Identifiers

PMID36268601
PMCPMC9991957
OpenAlexW4306974896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.