ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022
Homozygous factor V leiden mutation: Rare etiology of pulmonary embolism.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A propensity score-matched study including 250,000 patients with Factor V Leiden shows significantly increased mortality in comparison with individuals without thrombophilia.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Complications of Mesenteric Vein Thrombosis: Heterozygous Factor V Leiden Mutation Leads to Pulmonary Embolism in a Patient With Post-Bowel Resection Surgery.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- A Challenging Diagnosis of Behçet's Disease Starting from Unexplained Fever Recurrence with Pulmonary Embolism: A Case Report.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
- Challenges of a Patient with Thromboembolism.Reports (MDPI) · 2023Article
- Bridging the Gap: Pregnancy-And Lactation-Associated Osteoporosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Venous thromboembolic disease (VTE), which includes pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), is a major public health problem with high morbidity and mortality. The main risk factors for VTE are surgery, active cancer, immobilization, trauma or fracture, pregnancy and estrogen therapy. Genetic risk factors are also present and are dominated by the factor V Leiden mutation, which is present in 20% of VTE and in 2-5% of the general population with an annual incidence of 0.1% (Margaglione and Grandone, 2011; Ridker et al., 1995) [4,5]. This mutation can be heterozygous or homozygous, which is rarer. In this context, we report the case of a 37-year-old patient with no medical or surgical history and no notable risk factors who was admitted to the emergency room for the management of acute dyspnea at rest in connection with a bilateral proximal pulmonary embolism originating from a homozygous factor V Leiden mutation.Despite the efforts of the World Health organization, pulmonary embolism remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in our days, and the etiological assessment is performed in a very few cases, which makes the management standardized and not specific. That is why it is important to make an etiological assessment in a systematic way especially in young subjects for an optimal management and to avoid recurrences. Case presentation: Here, we report a rare case of a 37-year-old patient, who was admitted for the management of resting dyspnea related to bilateral proximal pulmonary embolism, in whom the etiological work-up was in favor of a homozygous factor V Leiden mutation. This case shows diagnostic difficulties and management of this rare disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.