ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022
Comparative study of the effect of two different doses of remifentanil on bleeding control in lumbar fusion surgery: A randomized clinical trial.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- In reply: what is the main cause of hypotension after induction of anesthesia with remimazolam in elderly patients?Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Spinal fusion surgery completely prevents movement or friction between the two vertebrae. Remifentanil, a selective drug agonist, suppresses and decreases the vasomotor system upon release of histamine. In this study, the efficacy of remifentanil infusion at doses of 0.1 and 0.3 μg/kg/min in the control of low blood pressure was compared. Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 110 candidates for selective spinal fusion surgery were entered and randomized into 2 groups. The first group received 0.1 μg/kg/min and in the second group 0.3 μg/kg/min remifentanil. The systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, SPO2, and surgeon's satisfaction were measured and compared between groups. Results: the systolic blood pressure was significantly lower in patients receiving 0.3 μg of remifentanil by the time 30, 45, 60, and 90 min during the surgeries (P < 0.05). No significant difference was observed in terms of PR (P = 0.19) and SPO2 (P = 0.41) between the two groups. We also observed significantly higher duration of surgeries (P = 0.002), duration of anesthesia (P = 0.009), significantly higher bleeding volume (P < 0.001), higher fluid intake (P = 0.01) and higher transfused blood (P = 0.01) in patients that received 0.1 μg remifentanil compared to other patients. Conclusion: Here we showed that administration of 0.3 μg/kg/min remifentanil was associated with significantly lower systolic blood pressure during the surgeries. On the other hand, patients that received 0.1 μg/kg/min remifentanil had significantly higher duration of surgeries, duration of anesthesia, significantly higher bleeding volume, higher fluid intake, and also higher transfused blood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.