Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36268220›Full record

ArticleComputers in human behavior2023

An ontology-driven framework for knowledge representation of digital extortion attacks.

Masoudeh Keshavarzi, Hamid Reza Ghaffary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers in human behavior, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Masoudeh KeshavarziDepartment of Computer Engineering, Islamic Azad University of Ferdows Branch, Iran.
Hamid Reza GhaffaryDepartment of Computer Engineering, Islamic Azad University of Ferdows Branch, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the COVID-19 pandemic and the growing influence of the Internet in critical sectors of industry and society, cyberattacks have not only not declined, but have risen sharply. In the meantime, ransomware is at the forefront of the most devastating threats that have launched the lucrative illegal business. Due to the proliferation and variety of ransomware forays, there is a need for a new theory of categories. The intricacy and multiplicity of components involved in digital extortions entails the construction of a knowledge representation system that is able to organize large volumes of information from heterogeneous sources in a formal structured format and infer new knowledge from it. This paper suggests and develops a dedicated ontology of digital blackmails, called Rantology, with a particular focus on ransomware assaults. The logic coded in this ontology allows to assess the maliciousness of programs based on various factors, including called API functions and their behaviors. The proposed framework can be used to facilitate interoperability between cybersecurity experts and knowledge-based systems, and identify sensitive points for surveillance. The evaluation results based on several criteria confirm the adequacy of the suggested ontology in terms of clarity, modularity, consistency, coverage and inheritance richness.

Indexed as

Conceptual modelingCyber-ontologyKnowledge baseKnowledge graphPhilosophy of computer scienceRansomware

Identifiers

PMID36268220
PMCPMC9557090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.