ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022
Colorectal endometriosis: Diagnosis, surgical strategies and post-operative complications.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative pregnancy rate after colorectal resection versus other surgical procedures for deep infiltrating rectal endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Rectal Shaving in Colorectal Endometriosis Surgery-Definition, Evidence and Variability.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Transdisciplinary Approach to Endometriosis-Related Chronic Pelvic Pain in Colombia: A Consensus Statement for Patient-Centered CareRevista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia · 2026Article
- Pain Relief, Gastrointestinal Function, and Recurrence After Conservative versus Radical (Segmental Resection) Surgery for Bowel Endometriosis: A Prospective Cohort Study.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Infertility management in patients with bowel endometriosis: the current landscape and the promise of randomised trialsFacts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2025Article
- Relation of Endometrioma and Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis Surgery on Ovarian Reserve: A Large Single-Centre, Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of fertility & sterility · 2025Article
- Study on Chinese patients' views on endometriosis surgery and fertility preservation in the context of declining fertility.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Conservative Management of Bowel Endometriosis: Cross-Sectional Analysis for Assessing Clinical Outcomes and Quality-of-Life.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Postoperative rectovaginal fistula: stoma may not be necessary-a French retrospective cohort.Techniques in coloproctology · 2024Article
- Association between depression and endometriosis using data from NHANES 2005-2006.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The present work aimed to investigate the feasibility, complications, recurrence rate, and infertility outcomes of the radical and conservative surgical methods for colorectal endometriosis in short- and long-term follow-ups. Methods: In this prospective study, the patients with confirmed diagnosis of colorectal DIE were included from March 2015 to March 2021, who were referred to an Endometriosis Surgery Center affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS). Information on demographics, surgical approaches, intra-operative, and post-operative findings as well as complications were collected and compared. Six- and 12-month interviews were conducted to evaluate the functional outcomes of all the procedures. Results: Out of 3,111 patients who underwent endometriosis surgery, 837 (28.19%) with the average age of 34.2 ± 5.9 years and average ASRM score of 102.1 ± 36.8 had rectosigmoid endometriosis. Laparoscopic rectal shaving was performed in 263(30.0%) patients while 326 (37.2%) underwent segmental bowel resection, and 248 (28.30%) were treated with disc excision. Prophylactic ileostomy was performed in six (0.68%) patients and peritonitis was reported in four (0.45%). Five (0.58%) subjects developed rectovaginal fistula and one (0.11%) was diagnosed with bladder atonia. The recurrence rate was 3.8%, 1.2%, and 0.3% in rectal shaving, disc, and segmental bowel resection techniques, respectively. Dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and dyschezia were improved after surgery by 7.3, 9.4, and 12.5 times, respectively. We observed 25.2% of total pregnancy following the operation, the majority of which occurred in the first year after the surgery. Conclusion: There were very few short-term or long-term complications in the three different techniques when the choice was correct.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.