Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36268206›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022

A deep learning based multimodal fusion model for skin lesion diagnosis using smartphone collected clinical images and metadata.

Chubin Ou, Sitong Zhou, Ronghua Yang, Weili Jiang, Haoyang He, Wenjun Gan, Wentao Chen, Xinchi Qin, Wei Luo, Xiaobing Pi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. AI in Aesthetic/Cosmetic Dermatology: Current and Future.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Chubin OuClinical Research Institute, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China.
Sitong ZhouDepartment of Dermatology, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China.
Ronghua YangDepartment of Burn and Plastic Surgery, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Weili JiangR/D Center, Visionwise Medical Technology, Foshan, China.
Haoyang HeR/D Center, Visionwise Medical Technology, Foshan, China.
Wenjun GanGuangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Wentao ChenGuangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Xinchi QinGuangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Wei LuoClinical Research Institute, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China.
Xiaobing PiDepartment of Dermatology, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China.
Jiehua LiDepartment of Dermatology, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Skin cancer is one of the most common types of cancer. An accessible tool to the public can help screening for malign lesion. We aimed to develop a deep learning model to classify skin lesion using clinical images and meta information collected from smartphones. Methods: A deep neural network was developed with two encoders for extracting information from image data and metadata. A multimodal fusion module with intra-modality self-attention and inter-modality cross-attention was proposed to effectively combine image features and meta features. The model was trained on tested on a public dataset and compared with other state-of-the-art methods using five-fold cross-validation. Results: Including metadata is shown to significantly improve a model's performance. Our model outperformed other metadata fusion methods in terms of accuracy, balanced accuracy and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, with an averaged value of 0.768±0.022, 0.775±0.022 and 0.947±0.007. Conclusion: A deep learning model using smartphone collected images and metadata for skin lesion diagnosis was successfully developed. The proposed model showed promising performance and could be a potential tool for skin cancer screening.

Indexed as

attentiondeep learning - artificial neural networkmetadatamultimodal fusionskin cancer

Identifiers

PMID36268206
PMCPMC9577400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.