Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36268105›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2022

Impact of scanner variability on lymph node segmentation in computational pathology.

Amjad Khan, Andrew Janowczyk, Felix Müller, Annika Blank, Huu Giao Nguyen, Christian Abbet, Linda Studer, Alessandro Lugli, Heather Dawson, Jean-Philippe Thiran and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Amjad KhanInstitute of Pathology, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 31, CH-3008 Bern, Switzerland.
Andrew JanowczykCase Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Felix MüllerInstitute of Pathology, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 31, CH-3008 Bern, Switzerland.
Annika BlankInstitute of Pathology, City Hospital Triemli, Zürich, Switzerland.
Huu Giao NguyenInstitute of Pathology, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 31, CH-3008 Bern, Switzerland.
Christian AbbetSwiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL), Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Linda StuderInstitute of Pathology, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 31, CH-3008 Bern, Switzerland.
Alessandro LugliInstitute of Pathology, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 31, CH-3008 Bern, Switzerland.
Heather DawsonInstitute of Pathology, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 31, CH-3008 Bern, Switzerland.
Jean-Philippe ThiranSwiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL), Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Inti ZlobecInstitute of Pathology, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 31, CH-3008 Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

RadxTools for assessing tumor treatment response on imagingU01CA248226 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI TIWARI, PALLAVI, VISWANATH, SATISH EASWAR · 2020 to 2022
$1.4M
HistoTools: A suite of digital pathology tools for quality control, annotation and dataset identificationU01CA239055 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI JANOWCZYK, ANDREW ROBERT, MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2019 to 2022
$1.0M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA239055NCI NIH HHS U01 CA248226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computer-aided diagnostics in histopathology are based on the digitization of glass slides. However, heterogeneity between the images generated by different slide scanners can unfavorably affect the performance of computational algorithms. Here, we evaluate the impact of scanner variability on lymph node segmentation due to its clinical importance in colorectal cancer diagnosis. 100 slides containing 276 lymph nodes were digitized using 4 different slide scanners, and 50 of the lymph nodes containing metastatic cancer cells. These 400 scans were subsequently annotated by 2 experienced pathologists to precisely label lymph node boundary. Three different segmentation methods were then applied and compared: Hematoxylin-channel-based thresholding (HCT), Hematoxylin-based active contours (HAC), and a convolution neural network (U-Net). Evaluation of U-Net trained from both a single scanner and an ensemble of all scanners was completed. Mosaic images based on representative tiles from a scanner were used as a reference image to normalize the new data from different test scanners to evaluate the performance of a pre-trained model. Fine-tuning was carried out by using weights of a model trained on one scanner to initialize model weights for other scanners. To evaluate the domain generalization, domain adversarial learning and stain mix-up augmentation were also implemented. Results show that fine-tuning and domain adversarial learning decreased the impact of scanner variability and greatly improved segmentation across scanners. Overall, U-Net with stain mix-up (Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) = 0.87), domain adversarial learning (MCC = 0.86), and HAC (MCC = 0.87) were shown to outperform HCT (MCC = 0.81) for segmentation of lymph nodes when compared against the ground truth. The findings of this study should be considered for future algorithms applied in diagnostic routines.

Indexed as

Colorectal cancerComputational pathologyDomain generalizationFine tuningLymph nodeLymph node segmentationScanner variabilityWhole slide image

Identifiers

PMID36268105
PMCPMC9577043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.