ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2022
Quantitative Nuclear Histomorphometry Predicts Molecular Subtype and Clinical Outcome in Medulloblastomas: Preliminary Findings.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine learning-based models for prediction of survival in medulloblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Pooled it
- Quantitative Histomorphometric Analysis of Collagen Bundles in Masson's Trichrome Stained Rat (Health science reports · 2026Article
- Pediatric brain tumor classification using digital pathology and deep learning: Evaluation of SOTA methods on a multi-center Swedish cohort.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- AI-Powered Histology for Molecular Profiling in Brain Tumors: Toward Smart Diagnostics from Tissue.Cancers · 2025Review
- Radio-pathomic approaches in pediatric neuro-oncology: Opportunities and challenges.Neuro-oncology advancesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular subtypes of medulloblastoma [Sonic Hedgehog (SHH), Wingless/INT (WNT), Group 3, and Group 4] are defined by common patterns of gene expression. These differential gene expression patterns appear to result in different histomorphology and prognosis. Quantitative histomorphometry is a well-known method of computer-aided pathology image analysis. The hypotheses we sought to examine in this preliminary proof of concept study were whether computer extracted nuclear morphological features of medulloblastomas from digitized tissue slide images could independently: (1) distinguish between molecularly determined subgroups and (2) identify patterns within these subgroups that correspond with clinical outcome. Our dataset was composed of 46 medulloblastoma patients: 16 SHH (5 dead, 11 survived), 3 WNT (0 dead, 3 survived), 12 Group 3 (4 dead, 8 survived), and 15 were Group 4 (5 dead, 10 survived). A watershed-based thresholding scheme was used to automatically identify individual nuclei within digitized whole slide hematoxylin and eosin tissue images. Quantitative histomorphometric features corresponding to the texture (variation in pixel intensity), shape (variations in size, roundness), and architectural rearrangement (distances between, and number of connected neighbors) of nuclei were subsequently extracted. These features were ranked using feature selection schemes and these top-ranked features were then used to train machine-learning classifiers via threefold cross-validation to separate patients based on: (1) molecular subtype and (2) disease-specific outcomes within the individual molecular subtype groups. SHH and WNT tumors were separated from Groups 3 and 4 tumors with a maximum area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.7, survival within Group 3 tumors was predicted with an AUC of 0.92, and Group 3 and 4 patients were separated into high- and low-risk groups with
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.