ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2022
Classification of cervical biopsy free-text diagnoses through linear-classifier based natural language processing.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging sequence-to-sequence models for semantic annotation of Dutch pathology reports.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
- Revolutionizing Cytology and Cytopathology with Natural Language Processing and Chatbot Technologies: A Narrative Review on Current Trends and Future Directions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Routine cervical cancer screening has significantly decreased the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer. As selection of proper screening modalities depends on well-validated clinical decision algorithms, retrospective review correlating cytology and HPV test results with cervical biopsy diagnosis is essential for validating and revising these algorithms to changing technologies, demographics, and optimal clinical practices. However, manual categorization of the free-text biopsy diagnosis into discrete categories is extremely laborious due to the overwhelming number of specimens, which may lead to significant error and bias. Advances in machine learning and natural language processing (NLP), particularly over the last decade, have led to significant accomplishments and impressive performance in computer-based classification tasks. In this work, we apply an efficient version of an NLP framework, FastText™, to an annotated cervical biopsy dataset to create a supervised classifier that can assign accurate biopsy categories to free-text biopsy interpretations with high concordance to manually annotated data (>99.6%). We present cases where the machine-learning classifier disagrees with previous annotations and examine these discrepant cases after referee review by an expert pathologist. We also show that the classifier is robust on an untrained external dataset, achieving a concordance of 97.7%. In conclusion, we demonstrate a useful application of NLP to a real-world pathology classification task and highlight the benefits and limitations of this approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.