Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36268095›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2022

The impact of different coverslipping methods in the quality of the whole slide images used for diagnosis in pathology.

Diana Ferreira, João Vale, Mónica Curado, António Polónia, Catarina Eloy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Digital transformation of pathology - the European Society of Pathology expert opinion paper.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cutting-edge technology and automation in the pathology laboratory.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Diana FerreiraLaboratory of Pathology, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of University of Porto (Ipatimup), Porto, Portugal.
João ValeLaboratory of Pathology, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of University of Porto (Ipatimup), Porto, Portugal.
Mónica CuradoLaboratory of Pathology, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of University of Porto (Ipatimup), Porto, Portugal.
António PolóniaLaboratory of Pathology, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of University of Porto (Ipatimup), Porto, Portugal.
Catarina EloyLaboratory of Pathology, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of University of Porto (Ipatimup), Porto, Portugal.
Universidade do Porto · PTi3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital pathology workflow aims to create whole slide images (WSIs) for diagnosis. The quality of the WSIs depends primarily on the quality of the glass slides produced by the pathology laboratory, where the coverslipping method plays an important role. In this study we compare the glass, the film, and the liquid coverslipping methods to evaluate which ones are suitable to create WSIs for diagnosis. The study included 18 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks. Of each block, 3 consecutive sections were covered using 1 of the 3 methods. The slides were scanned and evaluated for quality criteria by 2 pathologists experienced in digital pathology. The coverslipping method interferes with the quality of the WSIs, as well as with the scanning time and the file size of the WSIs. All coverslipping methods were found suitable for diagnosis. The glass and liquid methods were manual and had similar results concerning the presence of air bubbles/polymer accumulation, air drying artefacts, tissue exposed, and staining alterations. The glass method was the one with more air bubbles. The liquid method was associated with more alterations on the WSIs, but with the lowest file sizes. Automation of coverslipping and calibration of the scanner for the coverslipping method chosen by the pathology laboratory are relevant for the final quality of the WSIs.

Indexed as

Coverslipping methodsDigital implementationDigital pathologyDigital workflowFilm coverslipGlass coverslipLiquid coverslipWhole slide image

Identifiers

PMID36268095
PMCPMC9576983
OpenAlexW4281401618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.