ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2022
A digital method to interpret the C-MYC stain in diffuse large B cell lymphoma.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (DLBCL, NOS) is a heterogenous group of aggressive lymphomas. C-MYC expression by immunohistochemical stain (IHC) is shown to be an independent prognostic factor in DLBCL. In the clinical setting, MYC stain is currently evaluated by manual quantification with a minimum positivity cut-off 40%. Manual quantification methods can be subjective and may show intra- and interobserver variability and variability between centers. Thus, stains which require definitive quantification such as MYC needs better standardized and precise methods. Here we present a simple digital algorithm for quantitative evaluation of MYC stain in DLBCL, NOS. For this, slides immunostained for C-MYC were scanned at 40X with a high-resolution, Philips Ultra Fast scanner (Koninklijke Philips N.V. Cambridge, MA). The images were manually assessed and appropriate areas with neoplastic cells were selected. For quantification, positive and negative C-MYC staining nuclei were scored using a modified Visiopharm APP Nuclei Detection, AI (Brightfield) using Visiopharm Image Analysis software (Visiopharm, Hørsholm, Denmark version 2018.09). The percentage positivity resulted by the digital method was concordant with the pathologist's interpretation with statistical significance (rs: 0.85968; p (2-tailed) = 0). Minor disadvantages were observed including failure to detect very weak staining and inability to separate neoplastic and non-neoplastic nuclei when admixed in the same area. If combined with a quick manual evaluation, a digital method like this with precision and reproducibility will be of great use in quantitative evaluation of MYC and other similar stains in clinical setting and will reduce intra- and interobserver variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.