ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2022
Histology segmentation using active learning on regions of interest in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Varying pixel resolution significantly improves deep learning-based carotid plaque histology segmentation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Label-free differentiation of functional zones in mature mouse placenta using micro-Raman imaging.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In digital pathology, deep learning has been shown to have a wide range of applications, from cancer grading to segmenting structures like glomeruli. One of the main hurdles for digital pathology to be truly effective is the size of the dataset needed for generalization to address the spectrum of possible morphologies. Small datasets limit classifiers' ability to generalize. Yet, when we move to larger datasets of whole slide images (WSIs) of tissue, these datasets may cause network bottlenecks as each WSI at its original magnification can be upwards of 100 000 by 100 000 pixels, and over a gigabyte in file size. Compounding this problem, high quality pathologist annotations are difficult to obtain, as the volume of necessary annotations to create a classifier that can generalize would be extremely costly in terms of pathologist-hours. In this work, we use Active Learning (AL), a process for iterative interactive training, to create a modified U-net classifier on the region of interest (ROI) scale. We then compare this to Random Learning (RL), where images for addition to the dataset for retraining are randomly selected. Our hypothesis is that AL shows benefits for generating segmentation results versus randomly selecting images to annotate. We show that after 3 iterations, that AL, with an average Dice coefficient of 0.461, outperforms RL, with an average Dice Coefficient of 0.375, by 0.086.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.