ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2022
Bladder cancer prognosis using deep neural networks and histopathology images.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening and Risk Assessment through Predictive Modeling on Medical Images and Records.The American journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Self-contrastive weakly supervised learning framework for prognostic prediction using whole slide images.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Computational Morphological Assessment of Bladder Cancer Tissue Is Prognostic of Recurrence and Overall Survival Following Transurethral Resection.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2025Article
- Ethical challenges and evolving strategies in the integration of artificial intelligence into clinical practice.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- An efficient graph attention framework enhances bladder cancer prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep Learning for Classification of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Activity in Whole Slide Images of Colonic Histopathology.The American journal of pathology · 2025Article
- Predicting Response to Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin in High-Risk Nonmuscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Using an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Pathology Assay: Development and Validation in an International 12-Center Cohort.The Journal of urology · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based histopathological assessment of tubulo-interstitial injury in chronic kidney diseases.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Masked pre-training of transformers for histology image analysis.Journal of pathology informatics · 2024Article
- Precise grading of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer with multi-scale pyramidal CNN.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A multi-model approach integrating whole-slide imaging and clinicopathologic features to predict breast cancer recurrence risk.NPJ breast cancer · 2024Article
- Deep Learning for Grading Endometrial Cancer.The American journal of pathology · 2024Article
- Bladder Cancer and Artificial Intelligence: Emerging Applications.The Urologic clinics of North America · 2024Review
- Translation of tissue-based artificial intelligence into clinical practice: from discovery to adoption.Oncogene · 2023Review
- Examining longitudinal markers of bladder cancer recurrence through a semiautonomous machine learning system for quantifying specimen atypia from urine cytology.Cancer cytopathology · 2023Article
- Machine learning models combining computed tomography semantic features and selected clinical variables for accurate prediction of the pathological grade of bladder cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Computational pathology in bladder cancer: A scoping review.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Recent studies indicate that bladder cancer is among the top 10 most common cancers in the world (Saginala et al. 2022). Bladder cancer frequently reoccurs, and prognostic judgments may vary among clinicians. As a favorable prognosis may help to inform less aggressive treatment plans, classification of histopathology slides is essential for the accurate prognosis and effective treatment of bladder cancer patients. Developing automated and accurate histopathology image analysis methods can help pathologists determine the prognosis of patients with bladder cancer. Materials and methods: In this study, we introduced Bladder4Net, a deep learning pipeline, to classify whole-slide histopathology images of bladder cancer into two classes: low-risk (combination of PUNLMP and low-grade tumors) and high-risk (combination of high-grade and invasive tumors). This pipeline consists of four convolutional neural network (CNN)-based classifiers to address the difficulties of identifying PUNLMP and invasive classes. We evaluated our pipeline on 182 independent whole-slide images from the New Hampshire Bladder Cancer Study (NHBCS) (Karagas et al., 1998; Sverrisson et al., 2014; Sverrisson et al., 2014) collected from 1994 to 2004 and 378 external digitized slides from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database (https://www.cancer.gov/tcga). Results: The weighted average F1-score of our approach was 0.91 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86-0.94) on the NHBCS dataset and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.97-1.00) on the TCGA dataset. Additionally, we computed Kaplan-Meier survival curves for patients who were predicted as high risk versus those predicted as low risk. For the NHBCS test set, patients predicted as high risk had worse overall survival than those predicted as low risk, with a log-rank p-value of 0.004. Conclusions: If validated through prospective trials, our model could be used in clinical settings to improve patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.