ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2022
Automatic breast carcinoma detection in histopathological micrographs based on Single Shot Multibox Detector.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of Deep Learning in Histopathology Images of Breast Cancer: A Review.Micromachines · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A diagnosis with histological classification by pathologists is very important for appropriate treatments to improve the prognosis of patients with breast cancer. However, the number of pathologists is limited, and assisting the pathological diagnosis by artificial intelligence becomes very important. Here, we presented an automatic breast lesions detection model using microscopic histopathological images based on a Single Shot Multibox Detector (SSD) for the first time and evaluated its significance in assisting the diagnosis. Methods: We built the data set and trained the SSD model with 1361 microscopic images and evaluated using 315 images. Pathologists and medical students diagnosed the images with or without the assistance of the model to investigate the significance of our model in assisting the diagnosis. Results: The model achieved 88.3% and 90.5% diagnostic accuracies in 3-class (benign, non-invasive carcinoma, or invasive carcinoma) or 2-class (benign or malignant) classification tasks, respectively, and the mean intersection over union was 0.59. Medical students achieved a remarkably higher diagnostic accuracy score (average 84.7%) with the assistance of the model compared to those without assistance (average 67.4%). Some people diagnosed images in a short time using the assistance of the model (shorten by average 6.4 min) while others required a longer time (extended by 7.2 min). Conclusion: We presented the automatic breast lesions detection method at high speed using histopathological micrographs. The present system may conveniently support the histological diagnosis by pathologists in laboratories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.