ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2022
Improving feature extraction from histopathological images through a fine-tuning ImageNet model.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning radiomics models based on contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound for predicting distant metastasis in rectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Pediatric brain tumor classification using digital pathology and deep learning: Evaluation of SOTA methods on a multi-center Swedish cohort.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Automated inspection of P&ID object recognition using deep learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Entropy-Regularized Attention for Explainable Histological Classification with Convolutional and Hybrid Models.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- WDRIV-Net: a weighted ensemble transfer learning to improve automatic type stratification of lumbar intervertebral disc bulge, prolapse, and herniation.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Article
- PMPred-AE: a computational model for the detection and interpretation of pathological myopia based on artificial intelligence.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Precise grading of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer with multi-scale pyramidal CNN.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Transfer Learning in Cancer Genetics, Mutation Detection, Gene Expression Analysis, and Syndrome Recognition.Cancers · 2024Review
- Article
- [The model transferability of AI in digital pathology : Potential and reality].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Learning representations for image-based profiling of perturbations.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Deep Learning in Hematology: From Molecules to Patients.Clinical hematology international · 2024Review
- Review
- Tissue classification and diagnosis of colorectal cancer histopathology images using deep learning algorithms. Is the time ripe for clinical practice implementation?Przeglad gastroenterologiczny · 2023Review
- Optimization of deep learning models for the prediction of gene mutations using unsupervised clustering.The journal of pathology. Clinical research · 2023Article
- Colorectal Cancer Survival Prediction Using Deep Distribution Based Multiple-Instance Learning.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Due to lack of annotated pathological images, transfer learning has been the predominant approach in the field of digital pathology. Pre-trained neural networks based on ImageNet database are often used to extract "off-the-shelf" features, achieving great success in predicting tissue types, molecular features, and clinical outcomes, etc. We hypothesize that fine-tuning the pre-trained models using histopathological images could further improve feature extraction, and downstream prediction performance. Methods: We used 100 000 annotated H&E image patches for colorectal cancer (CRC) to fine-tune a pre-trained Xception model via a 2-step approach. The features extracted from fine-tuned Xception (FTX-2048) model and Image-pretrained (IMGNET-2048) model were compared through: (1) tissue classification for H&E images from CRC, same image type that was used for fine-tuning; (2) prediction of immune-related gene expression, and (3) gene mutations for lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Five-fold cross validation was used for model performance evaluation. Each experiment was repeated 50 times. Findings: The extracted features from the fine-tuned FTX-2048 exhibited significantly higher accuracy (98.4%) for predicting tissue types of CRC compared to the "off-the-shelf" features directly from Xception based on ImageNet database (96.4%) (P value = 2.2 × 10 Conclusions: We proved the concept that fine-tuning the pretrained ImageNet neural networks with histopathology images can produce higher quality features and better prediction performance for not only the same-cancer tissue classification where similar images from the same cancer are used for fine-tuning, but also cross-cancer prediction for gene expression and mutation at patient level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.