Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36268059›Full record

ReviewJournal of pathology informatics2022

Artificial intelligence as a tool for diagnosis in digital pathology whole slide images: A systematic review.

João Pedro Mazuco Rodriguez, Rubens Rodriguez, Vitor Werneck Krauss Silva, Felipe Campos Kitamura, Gustavo Cesar Antônio Corradi, Ana Carolina Bertoletti de Marchi, Rafael Rieder

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pathology informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

João Pedro Mazuco RodriguezUniversity of Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Rubens RodriguezPathology Institute of Passo Fundo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Vitor Werneck Krauss SilvaDasaInova, Diagnósticos da América S.A., São Paulo, Brazil.
Felipe Campos KitamuraDasaInova, Diagnósticos da América S.A., São Paulo, Brazil.
Gustavo Cesar Antônio CorradiDasaInova, Diagnósticos da América S.A., São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Carolina Bertoletti de MarchiUniversity of Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Rafael RiederUniversity of Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital pathology had a recent growth, stimulated by the implementation of digital whole slide images (WSIs) in clinical practice, and the pathology field faces shortage of pathologists in the last few years. This scenario created fronts of research applying artificial intelligence (AI) to help pathologists. One of them is the automated diagnosis, helping in the clinical decision support, increasing efficiency and quality of diagnosis. However, the complexity nature of the WSIs requires special treatments to create a reliable AI model for diagnosis. Therefore, we systematically reviewed the literature to analyze and discuss all the methods and results in AI in digital pathology performed in WSIs on H&E stain, investigating the capacity of AI as a diagnostic support tool for the pathologist in the routine real-world scenario. This review analyzes 26 studies, reporting in detail all the best methods to apply AI as a diagnostic tool, as well as the main limitations, and suggests new ideas to improve the AI field in digital pathology as a whole. We hope that this study could lead to a better use of AI as a diagnostic tool in pathology, helping future researchers in the development of new studies and projects.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDiagnosisPathologyWhole slide images

Identifiers

PMID36268059
PMCPMC9577128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.