ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2022
Whole slide image data utilization informed by digital diagnosis patterns.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Practical considerations for pathologists when selecting digital pathology systems: an ESDIP guide.The Journal of pathology · 2026Review
- Decoding (digital) histopathology: The building blocks for computational researchers.PLOS digital health · 2026Review
- Highly Multiplexed Tissue Imaging in Precision Oncology and Translational Cancer Research.Cancer discovery · 2024Review
- Article
- Stain normalization in digital pathology: Clinical multi-center evaluation of image quality.Journal of pathology informatics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Context: Despite the benefits of digital pathology, data storage and management of digital whole slide images introduces new logistical and infrastructure challenges to traditionally analog pathology labs. Aims: Our goal was to analyze pathologist slide diagnosis patterns to determine the minimum number of pixels required during the diagnosis. Methods: We developed a method of using pathologist viewing patterns to vary digital image resolution across virtual slides, which we call variable resolution images. An additional pathologist reviewed the variable resolution images to determine if diagnoses could still be rendered. Results: Across all slides, the pathologists rarely zoomed in to the full resolution level. As a result, the variable resolution images are significantly smaller than the original whole slide images. Despite the reduction in image sizes, the final pathologist reviewer could still proide diagnoses on the variable resolution slide images. Conclusions: Future studies will be conducted to understand variability in resolution requirements between and within pathologists. These findings have the potential to dramatically reduce the data storage requirements of high-resolution whole slide images.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.