Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36267989›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Evaluating the risk of hypertension in residents in primary care in Shanghai, China with machine learning algorithms.

Ning Chen, Feng Fan, Jinsong Geng, Yan Yang, Ya Gao, Hua Jin, Qiao Chu, Dehua Yu, Zhaoxin Wang, Jianwei Shi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ning ChenSchool of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Feng FanSchool of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Jinsong GengSchool of Medicine, Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Yan YangSchool of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Ya GaoSchool of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Hua JinDepartment of General Practice, Yangpu Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Qiao ChuSchool of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Dehua YuDepartment of General Practice, Yangpu Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zhaoxin WangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China.
Jianwei ShiDepartment of General Practice, Yangpu Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNTongji University · CNShanghai Medical Information Center · CNNantong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The prevention of hypertension in primary care requires an effective and suitable hypertension risk assessment model. The aim of this study was to develop and compare the performances of three machine learning algorithms in predicting the risk of hypertension for residents in primary care in Shanghai, China. Methods: A dataset of 40,261 subjects over the age of 35 years was extracted from Electronic Healthcare Records of 47 community health centers from 2017 to 2019 in the Pudong district of Shanghai. Embedded methods were applied for feature selection. Machine learning algorithms, XGBoost, random forest, and logistic regression analyses were adopted in the process of model construction. The performance of models was evaluated by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy and F1-score. Results: The XGBoost model outperformed the other two models and achieved an AUC of 0.765 in the testing set. Twenty features were selected to construct the model, including age, diabetes status, urinary protein level, BMI, elderly health self-assessment, creatinine level, systolic blood pressure measured on the upper right arm, waist circumference, smoking status, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, frequency of drinking, glucose level, urea nitrogen level, total cholesterol level, diastolic blood pressure measured on the upper right arm, exercise frequency, time spent engaged in exercise, high salt consumption, and triglyceride level. Conclusions: XGBoost outperformed random forest and logistic regression in predicting the risk of hypertension in primary care. The integration of this risk assessment model into primary care facilities may improve the prevention and management of hypertension in residents.

Indexed as

HypertensionMachine LearningAdultAgedAlgorithmsChinaCholesterolCreatinineGlucoseHumansLipoproteins, HDLLipoproteins, LDLNitrogenPrimary Health CareTriglyceridesUreaCholesterolCreatinineGlucoseLipoproteins, HDLLipoproteins, LDLNitrogenTriglyceridesUreahypertensionmachine learning algorithmsprimary carerisk assessment modelrisk of hypertension

Identifiers

PMID36267989
PMCPMC9577109
OpenAlexW4301398558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.