Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36267970›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Clinical Robotic Surgery Association (India Chapter) and Indian rectal cancer expert group's practical consensus statements for surgical management of localized and locally advanced rectal cancer.

S P Somashekhar, Avanish Saklani, Jagannath Dixit, Jagdish Kothari, Sandeep Nayak, O V Sudheer, Surender Dabas, Jagadishwar Goud, Venkatesh Munikrishnan, Pavan Sugoor and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

S P SomashekharDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Manipal Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Avanish SaklaniDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Jagannath DixitDepartment of GI Surgery, HCG Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Jagdish KothariDepartment of Surgical Oncology HCG Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Sandeep NayakDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Fortis Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
O V SudheerDepartment of GI Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Amrita Institute of Medical Science, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Surender DabasDepartment of Surgical Oncology, BL Kapur-Max Superspeciality Hospital, Delhi, India.
Jagadishwar GoudDepartment of Surgical Oncology, AOI Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Venkatesh MunikrishnanDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Apollo Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Pavan SugoorDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Prasanth PenumaduDepartment of Surgical Oncology, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.
C RamachandraDirector and Head, Department of Surgical Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Shilpa MehendaleDirector and Head, Department of Surgical Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Akhil DahiyaDepartment of Clinical and Medical Affairs, Intuitive Surgical, California, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: There are standard treatment guidelines for the surgical management of rectal cancer, that are advocated by recognized physician societies. But, owing to disparities in access and affordability of various treatment options, there remains an unmet need for personalizing these international guidelines to Indian settings. Methods: Clinical Robotic Surgery Association (CRSA) set up the Indian rectal cancer expert group, with a pre-defined selection criterion and comprised of the leading surgical oncologists and gastrointestinal surgeons managing rectal cancer in India. Following the constitution of the expert Group, members identified three areas of focus and 12 clinical questions. A thorough review of the literature was performed, and the evidence was graded as per the levels of evidence by Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. The consensus was built using the modified Delphi methodology of consensus development. A consensus statement was accepted only if ≥75% of the experts were in agreement. Results: Using the results of the review of the literature and experts' opinions; the expert group members drafted and agreed on the final consensus statements, and these were classified as "strong or weak", based on the GRADE framework. Conclusion: The expert group adapted international guidelines for the surgical management of localized and locally advanced rectal cancer to Indian settings. It will be vital to disseminate these to the wider surgical oncologists and gastrointestinal surgeons' community in India.

Indexed as

abdominoperineal resectioncircumferential resection marginconsensus statementlocal excisionlow-anterior resectionrectal cancerrectumtotal mesorectal excision

Identifiers

PMID36267970
PMCPMC9577482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.