ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Development and feasibility evaluation of an AR-assisted radiotherapy positioning system.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- First-in-human trial using mixed-reality visualization for patient setup during breast or chest wall radiotherapy.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2024Trial
- The Clinical outcomes following pencil beam scanning proton therapy for skull base chordoma and chondrosarcoma: a single-institution experience.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2026Article
- The Contemporary Role of Virtual and Augmented Reality in Radiation Oncology: A Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Utilization of extended-reality technologies in the field of medical radiation.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Review
- Application of image recognition-based tracker-less augmented reality navigation system in a series of sawbone trials.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2024Article
- Feasibility evaluation of radiotherapy positioning system guided by augmented reality and point cloud registration.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- Augmented reality in brachytherapy: A narrative review.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2024Review
- A Novel Registration Method for a Mixed Reality Navigation System Based on a Laser Crosshair Simulator: A Technical Note.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Human Operation Augmentation through Wearable Robotic Limb Integrated with Mixed Reality Device.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- HoloLensTherapeutic advances in urologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study is to develop an augmented reality (AR)-assisted radiotherapy positioning system based on HoloLens 2 and to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of this method in the clinical environment. Methods: The obtained simulated computed tomography (CT) images of an "ISO cube", a cube phantom, and an anthropomorphic phantom were reconstructed into three-dimensional models and imported into the HoloLens 2. On the basis of the Vuforia marker attached to the "ISO cube" placed at the isocentric position of the linear accelerator, the correlation between the virtual and real space was established. First, the optimal conditions to minimize the deviation between virtual and real objects were explored under different conditions with a cube phantom. Then, the anthropomorphic phantom-based positioning was tested under the optimal conditions, and the positioning errors were evaluated with cone-beam CT. Results: Under the normal light intensity, the registration and tracking angles are 0°, the distance is 40 cm, and the deviation reached a minimum of 1.4 ± 0.3 mm. The program would not run without light. The hologram drift caused by the light change, camera occlusion, and head movement were 0.9 ± 0.7 mm, 1.0 ± 0.6 mm, and 1.5 ± 0.9 mm, respectively. The anthropomorphic phantom-based positioning errors were 3.1 ± 1.9 mm, 2.4 ± 2.5 mm, and 4.6 ± 2.8 mm in the X (lateral), Y (vertical), and Z (longitudinal) axes, respectively, and the angle deviation of Rtn was 0.26 ± 0.14°. Conclusion: The AR-assisted radiotherapy positioning based on HoloLens 2 is a feasible method with certain advantages, such as intuitive visual guidance, radiation-free position verification, and intelligent interaction. Hardware and software upgrades are expected to further improve accuracy and meet clinicalbrendaannmae requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.