ArticleTanaffos2021
Measurement of Gastric Residual Volume via Ultrasound after Receiving Intravenous Ondansetron, Metoclopramide, and Neostigmine in Critically Ill Patients: A Double-Blind Clinical Trial.
Article in Tanaffos, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Two Different Doses of Neostigmine on the Gastric Residual Volume and Aspiration in Critically Ill Patients Under Enteral Feeding; A Comparative Controlled Randomized Trial.Anesthesiology and pain medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gastric residual volume (GRV) is considered an important parameter for gastric emptying and nutrition tolerance. This volume is measured before any nutrition and has a direct effect on the volume and timing of the next nutrition. The present study aimed to examine the GRV via ultrasound after receiving intravenous ondansetron, metoclopramide, and neostigmine. Materials and Methods: In the present study, 40 patients were included in the study, 10 patients were excluded from the study due to death during treatment, and 30 patients were divided into three groups of 10(10 patients in each group).The first, second, and third groups received 2.5, 10, and 8 mg neostigmine, metoclopramide, and ondansetron every 8 h, respectively. The drugs were infused as a micro set in 100 ml normal saline into patients within 30 min. The patients underwent ultrasound imaging and GRV measurement by an intensive care unit (ICU) subspecialty fellow, who was not aware of the drugs received by the patients, in the 1 Results: A total of 40 patients entered the study based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The effect of neostigmine on reducing GRV (Gastric residual volume) in ICU patients was better than those of the other two drugs, which was significant. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that neostigmine has a better and significant effect on reducing GRV in ICU patients, compared to those of ondansetron and metoclopramide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36267931PMC9577208W4307036420What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.