ArticleTanaffos2021
Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis in Children: Diagnosis and Treatment Outcomes.
Article in Tanaffos, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis (PAP) is an uncommon pulmonary disease characterized by the accumulation of surfactant composed of proteins and lipids due to disruption of surfactant clearance by alveolar macrophages. The current standard treatment is lung lavage. There are no specific criteria for lavage, but in case of observing these signs it is recommended to perform lavage for the patient: progressive respiratory failure, no labored breathing at rest, and drop in oxygen level during activity (>5%). Materials and Methods: In this study, patients with PAP admitted to Pediatric ward of Masih Daneshvari Hospital were studied. The required data were collected including the patient's demographic data, clinical signs and radiographic data, the number of admissions, the age of diagnosis, detection and treatment methods, number of lavage, current condition of the patient, and in case of death, the cause of death. Results: In this study, 17 patients with PAP who were admitted during the past 15 years were examined; among which 7 patients were boys (41.2%) and 10 were girls (58.8%). The mean age of population was 11.79±7.21 years. Transbronchial Lung Biopsy (TBLB) (47.1%) and open lung biopsy (52.9%) were used for diagnosis of patients. Lung lavage was used to treat patients, 15 of whom were treated by this method. Five of the patients died because of their serious conditions. Conclusion: Therapy method in the present study was lavage for both lungs, and it was performed for all patients except for two patients due to their anatomical complications. This method is still considered as the gold standard for PAP. Considering the findings from previous studies and the present study, it seems that Whole Lung Lavage (WLL) was fruitful for patients who had the indication for using this therapy and it played a significant role in improving the prognosis of patients. Besides, it is recommended to do follow-up regularly in order to have more therapeutic efficacy and increased patient longevity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36267924PMC9577214W4307031884What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.