Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36267902›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2022

Effects of iron deficiency and iron supplementation at the host-microbiota interface: Could a piglet model unravel complexities of the underlying mechanisms?

Munawar Abbas, Zeynep Hayirli, Hal Drakesmith, Simon C Andrews, Marie C Lewis

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A review of the iron requirements and its determination in commercial poultry.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Iron and the immune system.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2025
    Review
  7. Effects of DifferentMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Gallium Resistance inApplied microbiology (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Iron, Hepcidin, and Immunity.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Munawar AbbasFood and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom.
Zeynep HayirliFood and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom.
Hal DrakesmithMRC Human Immunology Unit, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Simon C AndrewsSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom.
Marie C LewisFood and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom.
University of Reading · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00008/10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Iron deficiency is the most prevalent human micronutrient deficiency, disrupting the physiological development of millions of infants and children. Oral iron supplementation is used to address iron-deficiency anemia and reduce associated stunting but can promote infection risk since restriction of iron availability serves as an innate immune mechanism against invading pathogens. Raised iron availability is associated with an increase in enteric pathogens, especially Enterobacteriaceae species, accompanied by reductions in beneficial bacteria such as Bifidobacteria and lactobacilli and may skew the pattern of gut microbiota development. Since the gut microbiota is the primary driver of immune development, deviations from normal patterns of bacterial succession in early life can have long-term implications for immune functionality. There is a paucity of knowledge regarding how both iron deficiency and luminal iron availability affect gut microbiota development, or the subsequent impact on immunity, which are likely to be contributors to the increased risk of infection. Piglets are naturally iron deficient. This is largely due to their low iron endowments at birth (primarily due to large litter sizes), and their rapid growth combined with the low iron levels in sow milk. Thus, piglets consistently become iron deficient within days of birth which rapidly progresses to anemia in the absence of iron supplementation. Moreover, like humans, pigs are omnivorous and share many characteristics of human gut physiology, microbiota and immunity. In addition, their precocial nature permits early maternal separation, individual housing, and tight control of nutritional intake. Here, we highlight the advantages of piglets as valuable and highly relevant models for human infants in promoting understanding of how early iron status impacts physiological development. We also indicate how piglets offer potential to unravel the complexities of microbiota-immune responses during iron deficiency and in response to iron supplementation, and the link between these and increased risk of infectious disease.

Indexed as

anaemiadysbiosisenteric infectiongut microbiotaimmunityiron deficiencyiron supplementationneonatal gut health

Identifiers

PMID36267902
PMCPMC9577221
OpenAlexW4301397821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.