ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022
Prospective pilot study of tirofiban in progressive stroke after intravenous thrombolysis.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of Tirofiban following intravenous thrombolysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of tirofiban in acute ischemic stroke patients with early neurological deterioration: a meta-analysis.BMC neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Tirofiban Combination Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Brain and behavior · 2025Pooled it
- Comparing Early National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Versus 90-Day Modified Rankin Scale Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke Trials: A Systematic Review and Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Pooled it
- Early antiplatelet therapy after intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of tirofiban for acute ischemic stroke without large and medium vessel occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Tirofiban after intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke patients: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Efficacy and safety of treatment strategies for early neurological deterioration after acute ischemic stroke: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of adjuvant tirofiban versus intravenous thrombolysis alone in acute ischemic stroke: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Review
- Efficacy and safety of early tirofiban administration after intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischaemic stroke: the multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled RESCUE BT3 trial protocol.European stroke journal · 2026Article
- Optimizing Early Antithrombotic Therapy Within 24 Hours of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke.CNS drugs · 2026Review
- Concurrent Acute Ischemic Stroke and Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Case Report on Sequential Endovascular Intervention and Peri-Procedural Antiplatelet Management with Tirofiban.International medical case reports journal · 2026Article
- Effect of Intravenous Tirofiban Versus Placebo on Excellent Outcome in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: The Multicenter, Randomized INSTANT Trial Protocol.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- A clinical-radiomics nomogram to predict early neurological deterioration in patients with stroke undergoing intravenous thrombolysis.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2025Article
- Safety and efficacy of tirofiban after intravenous thrombolysis with urokinase in patients with acute ischemic stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Safety of alteplase intravenous thrombolysis and influencing factors of clinical outcome in elderly patients with acute ischemic stroke.BMC neurology · 2024Article
- Early tirofiban administration after intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke (ADVENT): Study protocol of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.European stroke journal · 2024Article
- A machine learning-based predictive model for predicting early neurological deterioration in lenticulostriate atheromatous disease-related infarction.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Early antiplatelet therapy was associated with reduced neurological deterioration in stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis.Brain circulationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is a standard procedure for the treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Improving the therapeutic efficacy of IVT is an important task for neurologists. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of early low-dose tirofiban treatment in AIS patients with early neurological deterioration (END) after IVT. Methods: In this prospective and randomized pilot study, 73 AIS patients with END were recruited from a local hospital in China. Of these, 14 patients were treated with regular antiplatelet agents (aspirin plus clopidogrel) and 59 patients were treated with tirofiban within 24 h of IVT, followed by regular antiplatelet therapy. Neurological deficits and functional recovery were assessed with NIHSS and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 7 and 90 days. During the 90-day follow-up period, both hemorrhagic (e.g., intracerebral hemorrhage) and non-hemorrhagic (e.g., pneumonia) events were recorded. Results: Treatment with tirofiban compared with regular antiplatelet therapy: (1) improved functional recovery of AIS patients to mRS (≤2) at both 7 and 90 days (odds ratios [ORs], 1.37 and 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-1.61 and 1.26-2.12; Conclusion: Early treatment with low-dose tirofiban in AIS patients with neurologic deterioration after IVT potentially improved functional recovery and attenuated neurologic deficits as early as 7 days and did not increase the risk of various hemorrhagic complications. However, the therapeutic efficacy of tirofiban treatment in END patients needs to be determined by future randomized clinical trials with a large study population. Clinical trial registration: http://www.chictr.org.cn/, Identifier ChiCTR2200058513.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.